21–30 of 519 posts
They apparently tried to combat NSFW generation by filtering the training dataset not to include any.
(Edit: it may have removed that wording now: https://github.com/Stability-AI/stablediffusion/commit/ca86d... ) They can force model upgrades too: > The New AI Model Licenses Have a Legal Loophole (OpenRAIL-M of Stable Diffusion) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5M-dvzpzSQ
They apparently tried to combat NSFW generation by filtering the training dataset not to include any.
(Edit: it may have removed that wording now: https://github.com/Stability-AI/stablediffusion/commit/ca86d... ) They can force model upgrades too: > The New AI Model Licenses Have a Legal Loophole (OpenRAIL-M of Stable Diffusion) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5M-dvzpzSQ
> greatly improves the quality of the generated images compared to earlier V1 releases That’s great!
The repo provides a chart with a quantitative measure (FID/CLIP score) where the new 2.0 models do indeed have much better results than the earlier 1.5 model.
They apparently tried to combat NSFW generation by filtering the training dataset not to include any.
Deceitful extremists and vengeful criminals fabricating lies seem to be a far more serious problem than fantasy porno.
These new updates are quite great but are they so game-changing that it is considered 2.0?
Demoing even the v1 of stable diffusion to the non-technical general users blows them away completely.
Now that v2 is here, it’s clear we’re not able to keep pace in developing products to take advantage of it.
The general public still is blown away by autosuggest in mobile OS keyboards. Very few really know how far AI tech has evolved.
Huge market opportunity for folks wanting to ride the wave here.
This is exciting for me personally, since I can keep plugging in newer and better versions of these models into my app and it becomes better.
Even some of the tech folks I demo my app to, are simply amazed how I can manage to do this solo.
They apparently tried to combat NSFW generation by filtering the training dataset not to include any.
(Edit: it may have removed that wording now: https://github.com/Stability-AI/stablediffusion/commit/ca86d... ) They can force model upgrades too: > The New AI Model Licenses Have a Legal Loophole (OpenRAIL-M of Stable Diffusion) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5M-dvzpzSQ
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33727177
https://github.com/Stability-AI/stablediffusion/commit/ca86d...
I am a solo dev working on a creative content creation app to leverage the latest developments in AI. Demoing even the v1 of stable diffusion to the non-technical general users blows them away completely. Now that v2 is here, it’s clear we’re not able to keep pace in developing products to take advantage of it. The general public still is blown away by autosuggest in mobile OS keyboards. Very few really know how far…