Earlier quoted context omitted.
I feel like you're understating it a bit; 20k years ago Manhattan was covered in over a thousand feet of ice. The Wisconsin Ice Sheet was huge and covered a substantial portion of the modern day United States: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_glaciation#/media/Fi...
On the other hand, the planet was only 4~4.5ºC cooler than at the beginning of the industrial area, so it was not that much cooler. For those who think that warming up the planet by 3 or 4ºC is not a big deal...
Drought Reveals Rare American Lion Fossil in Dried Up Mississippi River
21–30 of 32 posts
Re: Drought Reveals Rare American Lion Fossil in Dried Up Mississippi River
#22I'm always amazed when reading about the sheer size of ice age animals that existed. I kinda get how dinosaurs were able to get so large, due to environmental factors at the time, but you would assume that food was sparse during the ice age. How did the ecosystem support large mammals?
Larger animals retain heat better. The square-cube law in action. Hence why dragonflies in the lowlands of my country are quite small, but the ones in sub-alpine regions are fricking massive. (Ditto the hares). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square–cube_law
Compared to the rainforest lizards, our prairie ones are 4x larger on average. Like dwarf iguanas in some respects with large claws and speed.
I’m also a huge fan of dragonflies here in north Texas - quite common seeing 3-5” long ones zooming about with gorgeous variety of colors. I’ve noticed they appreciate outdoor fans and treat the breeze path as a playground.
Re: Drought Reveals Rare American Lion Fossil in Dried Up Mississippi River
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Megafauna were actually the norm. Just look at the Dinosaurs and Mammoths. So being smaller is a recent change. Larger animals are more efficient with their calories, expending less energy per pound vs a smaller animal. Large animals also have a better volume to surface ratio, making it easier for them to keep themselves warm.
>Larger animals are more efficient with their calories, expending less energy per pound vs a smaller animal. Interesting. If this is true, why do feed efficiency graphs look like this? https://ib.bioninja.com.au/options/option-c-ecology-and-cons...
Cows eat grass.
Pigs and chickens are omnivores that can save themselves from the synthesis of a lot of protein building blocks.
Fish are cold blooded so they don't waste a big portion of calories that they eat keeping warm.
Only the comparison between chickens and pigs is really relevant here.
Re: Drought Reveals Rare American Lion Fossil in Dried Up Mississippi River
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ice age was not that much colder than now. Most of Canada was covered with ice, but most of United States wasn’t. Places which are hot today were warm at the time, and places that are warm were temperate. This means that there is no reason to assume that food was scarce. Here is a way to think about it: Alaska today is probably colder than southeastern US was during ice age. Is food in Alaska so scarce today that it…
I feel like you're understating it a bit; 20k years ago Manhattan was covered in over a thousand feet of ice. The Wisconsin Ice Sheet was huge and covered a substantial portion of the modern day United States: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_glaciation#/media/Fi...
Glaciers were huge. There's an xkcd that talks about that.[1]
Re: Drought Reveals Rare American Lion Fossil in Dried Up Mississippi River
#25Re: Drought Reveals Rare American Lion Fossil in Dried Up Mississippi River
#26I'm always amazed when reading about the sheer size of ice age animals that existed. I kinda get how dinosaurs were able to get so large, due to environmental factors at the time, but you would assume that food was sparse during the ice age. How did the ecosystem support large mammals?
Glyptodons in South America made huge burrows: https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/get-lost-in-me... Then consider that plants have a symbiotic relationship with animals. And think about the size of Avocados (for example), and in particular the seed in the middle. Birds aren't going to distribute them...
Re: Drought Reveals Rare American Lion Fossil in Dried Up Mississippi River
#27Re: Drought Reveals Rare American Lion Fossil in Dried Up Mississippi River
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Glyptodons in South America made huge burrows: https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/get-lost-in-me... Then consider that plants have a symbiotic relationship with animals. And think about the size of Avocados (for example), and in particular the seed in the middle. Birds aren't going to distribute them...
I’ve read that sloths we’re responsible for spreading avocado seeds, but it makes me wonder whether those seeds were always that large?
Re: Drought Reveals Rare American Lion Fossil in Dried Up Mississippi River
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
I feel like you're understating it a bit; 20k years ago Manhattan was covered in over a thousand feet of ice. The Wisconsin Ice Sheet was huge and covered a substantial portion of the modern day United States: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_glaciation#/media/Fi...
On the other hand, the planet was only 4~4.5ºC cooler than at the beginning of the industrial area, so it was not that much cooler. For those who think that warming up the planet by 3 or 4ºC is not a big deal...
Re: Drought Reveals Rare American Lion Fossil in Dried Up Mississippi River
#30I'm always amazed when reading about the sheer size of ice age animals that existed. I kinda get how dinosaurs were able to get so large, due to environmental factors at the time, but you would assume that food was sparse during the ice age. How did the ecosystem support large mammals?
Larger animals retain heat better. The square-cube law in action. Hence why dragonflies in the lowlands of my country are quite small, but the ones in sub-alpine regions are fricking massive. (Ditto the hares). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square–cube_law
I'm mostly curious how the ecosystem was able to support so many large animals, from the base layer of the food chain up. If there was an ice sheet a mile thick covering all of Canada down to Wisconsin, then most of north America must have been tundra. Were there less trees? Did grasslands thrive across the continent which supported ruminants more, which in turn provided more food for large predators?