Earlier quoted context omitted.
Web3 based apps where a company like Facebook or Instagram can't delete your content just because it might contain a nipple.
It’s amazing how this description is entirely unrelated to the reality of the so-called web3. Not just “we’re still working out some of the details,” but literally none of it exists. It’s like you’re promised a grand night at the opera and the bus takes you to a roach-infested casino. “Music? We don’t need it, the slot machines make enough sound. Now are you going to buy some tokens?”
Web3 – An Arrogant and Treacherous Successor Doomed to Fail
71–80 of 267 posts
Re: Web3 – An Arrogant and Treacherous Successor Doomed to Fail
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Web 3/3.0 was invented by finance bros Web3, not Web 3.0, not the same thing at all, the latter is the next incarnation of Tim Berners-Lee's vision for the web and has nothing to do with finance and crypto bros. It's important to make the distinction because 3.0 is actually important.
Honestly...... 3.0 is actually dead on arrival thanks to the proliferation of "Web3" the brand damage is done and "3.0" should find a new name ASAP.
Re: Web3 – An Arrogant and Treacherous Successor Doomed to Fail
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
The distinction is that "the semantic web" went nowhere and "a bunch of crypto currency fuckery" has millions of users globally.
I'm with you on the success (or lack thereof) of the semantic web. I don't consider gambling a good thing just because there are millions of gamblers. I feel the same about cryptocurrency.
How is using a decentralised Zoom alternative like Huddle01 gambling?
How is using a decentralised Pusher alternative like Push gambling?
I agree, that in the last years most web3 apps focused on financial/blockchain specific use-cases. I also agree, that many of them had quite dubious claims.
But that's not all there is and I think, that won't be the reason it will gain mainstream adoption.
Re: Web3 – An Arrogant and Treacherous Successor Doomed to Fail
#74Web3 is irrelevant. Actual Web 3.0 isn't anything blockchain based. Web 3.0 is the total corporate take-over of the entire web by Google/MS/Apple requiring CA based TLS in the HTTP/3 (QUIC) implementations in their browsers.
i just want to be able to use udp without the headache of webrtc
Re: Web3 – An Arrogant and Treacherous Successor Doomed to Fail
#75>The real single reason for which I believe that all this will come tumbling down is cause of the fact that all this is falsely hyped as being something better than its predecessors but in reality it is not. How so? If you're saying that this is the one single reason, then you have to support it with evidence.
It's slower and more expensive.
Re: Web3 – An Arrogant and Treacherous Successor Doomed to Fail
#76>The real single reason for which I believe that all this will come tumbling down is cause of the fact that all this is falsely hyped as being something better than its predecessors but in reality it is not. How so? If you're saying that this is the one single reason, then you have to support it with evidence.
Re: Web3 – An Arrogant and Treacherous Successor Doomed to Fail
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think, you should look into Filecoin and Arweave. Your assumptions seem to be based on the (rather specific) use-case of art NFTs. They got quite some hype, but to be honest, I didn't get them either.
Why exactly would you trust random strangers with your critical data rather than use S3?
Re: Web3 – An Arrogant and Treacherous Successor Doomed to Fail
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
Web2: you stop paying a cloud provider, your data is gone. Web3: you stop paying a network, your data stays online. Either because it's permanent by default (blockchain, blockweave) or because people deem it interesting and pin it (IPFS) Seems like a fundamental improvement to me.
IPFS isn't Web3
Re: Web3 – An Arrogant and Treacherous Successor Doomed to Fail
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
Web2 - stores exabytes of data. Web3 - stores a few text files and rotten hyperlinks to jpgs of (if you're lucky) poorly-drawn apes and (if you're unlucky) rugs, while setting billions of dollars on fire.
I think, you should look into Filecoin and Arweave. Your assumptions seem to be based on the (rather specific) use-case of art NFTs. They got quite some hype, but to be honest, I didn't get them either.
2. Dropbox and Drive are cheaper and better. S3 is cheaper.
Re: Web3 – An Arrogant and Treacherous Successor Doomed to Fail
#80I seriously do not see and never saw how "Web 3.0" is a follow up from web 1 and 2. The whole thing was a hijack by ponzi schemers or just another way to get someone to get their life savings into some crypto nonsense.
Exactly… NFT’s blah blah .. blockchain everything .. came off as like a sales pitch and never seemed to resonant as where the web was headed
A seamless on-ramp from a bank account to a crypto wallet will really change the way we pay for things online. I believe this on-ramp is coming with CBDCs.
Edit: HN is hopelessly anti Wayne Gretzky when it comes to crypto :D
Edit 2: I should have mentioned 'online'