Cobalt – a stripped down Chromium for apps, Linux and embedded systems
21–30 of 55 posts
Re: Cobalt – a stripped down Chromium for apps, Linux and embedded systems
#22Re: Cobalt – a stripped down Chromium for apps, Linux and embedded systems
#23Where did OP discover that this is based on Chromium? I don't actually think that it is - I'm fairly certain it is not based on Chromium (at least the parts that matter), it's a separate, extremely cut-down HTML engine
So it's based on Chromium, but pretty far from it at this point.
Re: Cobalt – a stripped down Chromium for apps, Linux and embedded systems
#24From the footer: > © Google 2019 Not exactly a new or fully supported project, but I do see recent commits on the repo.
It's definitely fully supported, it gets many upgrades and has a pretty long-term and serious roadmap. I strongly recommend not to use it though.
Considering it comes from google, does that mean three months or six months?
Re: Cobalt – a stripped down Chromium for apps, Linux and embedded systems
#25Where did OP discover that this is based on Chromium? I don't actually think that it is - I'm fairly certain it is not based on Chromium (at least the parts that matter), it's a separate, extremely cut-down HTML engine
> The Cobalt Authors forked H5VCC, removed most of the Chromium code -- in particular WebCore and the Chrome Renderer and Compositor -- and built up from scratch an implementation of a simplified subset of HTML, the CSS Box Model for layout, and the Web APIs that were really needed to build a full-screen SPA browse and play application. So it's based on Chromium, but pretty far from it at this point.
Re: Cobalt – a stripped down Chromium for apps, Linux and embedded systems
#26Re: Cobalt – a stripped down Chromium for apps, Linux and embedded systems
#27I was hoping this article would tell me how it is different from Electron. Does anyone know? I'm guessing the main difference is that electron is "full chromium" while cobalt is using a modified smaller chromium.
I don't know electron, but cobalt has some limitations. On page you can find what html5 and css3 tags are supported. List is limited. Cobalt also does not support WebGL. But binary has ~45mb and works really fast compared to other engines on embedded devices. I was not able to run react app on Cobalt, but preact works really well. I've also been doing experiments with the Vue framework and it also works.
Disclosure: I work at Ekioh.
Re: Cobalt – a stripped down Chromium for apps, Linux and embedded systems
#28So a browser supporting a subset of HTML maintained by Google employees with an MIT license supporting Linux (especially Raspberry Pi) and Android?
Yes. I worked on this project for three years. This is exactly what it is. It’s also much more stable than chrome.
I find that exceedingly easy to believe… Chrom(e|ium) as it currently stands (for a rather long while now) is a massive resource hog. Stripping it down and re-writing huge portions of it (pretty much) from scratch can only be an improvement.
Re: Cobalt – a stripped down Chromium for apps, Linux and embedded systems
#29So a browser supporting a subset of HTML maintained by Google employees with an MIT license supporting Linux (especially Raspberry Pi) and Android?
Yes. I worked on this project for three years. This is exactly what it is. It’s also much more stable than chrome.
Re: Cobalt – a stripped down Chromium for apps, Linux and embedded systems
#30Can Cobalt be driven by Puppeteer, Playwright or Selenium?