Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A broken clock is right twice a day and all that. But the key point is 'if a referendum were blocked, they would fight the next general election as a referendum instead'. to what end? with no agreement from the UK government nothing will happen > Point being why would anyone invest in Scotland or the rest of the UK during such tumultuous times? there's no doubt it hurts investment in Scotland however its economic i…
> to what end? with no agreement from the UK government nothing will happen Obviously to exploit anti-union sentiments for political gain. > however its economic impact on leaving the UK would be more or less a non-event for the rest of the UK It would be followed by Ireland and the end of the union. England will find itself with a smaller population than Italy and similarly mired in political instability and infight…
and how effective has this been?
if the UK government doesn't permit it: it doesn't happen, end of story.
> It would be followed by Ireland and the end of the union.
I have news for you, Ireland left in 1921
(if England does end up being independent again its citizens would be significantly better off as the subsidy to the other parts of the UK are quite considerable)