241–250 of 362 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Came hear to say this. +1 for https://zombo.com/#HACKER_NEWS_PARODY_DOT_IO
*here Back in the day nobody on HN would so egregiously misspell words. This place is turning into Reddit.
Unrealistic. Not a single person complained about link not working with JavaScript disabled.
Also missing: How does this compare to X? (where X is an obscure project on github with no documentation of what it's feature boundaries are, has at best 1000 stars and further internet sleuthing suggests its at best only tangentially associated with the original comments domain. The end result being the author feels obliged to figure it out and reply incase not doing so seems arrogant and/or poorly educated in the d…
> Be midwit
> Pops in at random 5 levels deep into some discussion
> Says that a point is "whataboutism"
> Takes great personal pride in thinking that he's won the debate by using the vocabulary term he just learned
> Refuses to elaborate
> Leaves
Earlier quoted context omitted.
In 10 years of reading hacker news I never thought to press the [-] until this moment.
I always assumed [-] subtracted a point from that comment.
You missed the mandatory post on how I can read the author's blog post for 400 hours without recharging on my superior Mac M1, versus just 10 minutes on pleb Linux boxes.
Damn, I was afraid this was going to be someone stealing my genius idea. Gladly it was just tangential to that idea. Idea: Train an ai to construct entire threads based on the input of the title and link. There should be plenty of training material, and frankly I think it would be hilariously similar to the real threads. When new submissions are added to HN, the system will fetch the title and link, and predict the e…
Above algorithm generalizes all human knowledge ever conceived, in any format, as well as any future (duplicated!) ideas that may be conceived.
I donate above algorithm and all its results to public domain.
You're welcome.