11–20 of 26 posts
There's honestly such a clear bias in how they're handling this whole thing. I see the tides turning slowly though. I just don't understand why they're handling this with kid gloves when you see other people absolutely torn apart for much less.
The only company/person currently handled with kid gloves is another "billionaire" with a social media app with political ties.
Pretty rich coming from David Sacks Edit: recent profile of his media manipulation https://newrepublic.com/article/168125/david-sacks-elon-musk...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
A Godwin in two comments, that's pretty wild considering the topic.
So I shouldn't have mentioned it because it's a meme, and SBF should be in the clear now because he donated a few dollars of stolen funds, mostly from individuals who got sucked into it, to medical research. Solid.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So I shouldn't have mentioned it because it's a meme, and SBF should be in the clear now because he donated a few dollars of stolen funds, mostly from individuals who got sucked into it, to medical research. Solid.
Yes, but mostly because it is a very weak analogy that teaches us nothing.
There's honestly such a clear bias in how they're handling this whole thing. I see the tides turning slowly though. I just don't understand why they're handling this with kid gloves when you see other people absolutely torn apart for much less.
They aren't being handled with kid gloves, the company is being investigated. The only company/person currently handled with kid gloves is another "billionaire" with a social media app with political ties.
There's another question that's been irking me... How many other rotten to the core companies are there out there? I wonder how many are able to keep pressing on with their scam and never get caught.
I would take note when my company would make the news - simply out of corporate pride. I would also take note when we were involved in something scandalous (we got hacked, we provided services to someone that did unscrupulous stuff, we did unscrupulous stuff).
What I noticed is that our advertisements disappeared from news agencies the same week our story aired - and the news agencies didn't disclose support from our company, even if we were portaied in a positive light.
Pretty rich coming from David Sacks Edit: recent profile of his media manipulation https://newrepublic.com/article/168125/david-sacks-elon-musk...
You’re poisoning the well. It’s not even subtle, it’s a rough, crude, ham-fisted hatchet job.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They aren't being handled with kid gloves, the company is being investigated. The only company/person currently handled with kid gloves is another "billionaire" with a social media app with political ties.
Outside of Breitbart and maybe Fox News, I definitely wouldn't agree that the media handles Trump with kids gloves. Journalists are very happy to call him out for his missteps