https://www.inaturalist.org/ While I deserve no credit for its current success, it's been used by millions to: * catalogue millions of plants and animals around the world * tagged image data has become critical for computer vision training models * map species range and impact of various natural changes to biodiversity, with data cited in scientific journals * new species have been discovered through the app previous…
What was your involvement in iNaturalist?
Ask HN: What is the most impactful thing you've built?
571–580 of 759 posts
Re: Ask HN: What is the most impactful thing you've built?
#572https://www.inaturalist.org/ While I deserve no credit for its current success, it's been used by millions to: * catalogue millions of plants and animals around the world * tagged image data has become critical for computer vision training models * map species range and impact of various natural changes to biodiversity, with data cited in scientific journals * new species have been discovered through the app previous…
My wife (and sometimes me) use it. It's awesome!
Re: Ask HN: What is the most impactful thing you've built?
#573https://www.inaturalist.org/ While I deserve no credit for its current success, it's been used by millions to: * catalogue millions of plants and animals around the world * tagged image data has become critical for computer vision training models * map species range and impact of various natural changes to biodiversity, with data cited in scientific journals * new species have been discovered through the app previous…
iNaturalist is wonderful!
Re: Ask HN: What is the most impactful thing you've built?
#574Re: Ask HN: What is the most impactful thing you've built?
#575Earlier quoted context omitted.
why not find something that you would find rewarding to work on, even if it's on the side? the things i've done that feel impactful are little tools i've made to help the people i know
Honestly, I have lost the motivation. Or perhaps it that I find nothing about computers to be rewarding anymore. I've almost decided that life was simpler and better when everybody was not buried in a phone 12 hours a day and didn't need to be online from home to deal with the basic demands of working and living.
My problem is that I have no clue how you actually get involved with anything that matters unless you're top 1% skill.
I'm perfectly happy with connection as a modern requirement, it replaces the requirement to dedicated many square feet to using and storing papers, but endless scrolling and the algorithm that makes you keep doing it is fucking depressing to think about, and casts kind of an ugly hue over the whole tech industry, and so much of the industry is dedicated to delivering content people don't even particularly want.
I've also mostly lost interest in DIY tech for the most part. I've done lots of open source work, usually nobody cares. The only time I get excited is collaborating with existing projects.
I don't know anything about how people start new projects and actually have them take off, so I don't think about it much anymore. Startups mostly feel like scams to me.
Like, many of them provide a real useful service. But I wouldn't recommend most of them to anyone or use them myself. Most of them don't do anything that some cheaper service already does, and they usually have a bigger dev budget and a more predictable future. I don't want to tangle up my workflow with something brand new run by 3 people without a really good reason.
And worse, a lot of them don't provide anything useful.
And I'm even more disillusioned with DIY scale personal use tech. I can't think of any software I want that wouldn't take years to write, and I'm not going to spend 3 years working on some software just for myself. I'm sure I can save up and just buy a solution in that time. Anything I can do in a weekend probably already exists and I'd rather just use that.
And to make it worse, I'm not really happy with the tech community right now. The "Hacker ethos" is basically anti-tech. They only care about code as an exploration of ideas, and seem to hate real usable software in practice. They want pen and paper and film cameras back, and seem to care much more about even small amounts of metadata privacy than all the benefits tech could bring.
It's less this exciting underground scene building the future as this sad group of weekend tinkerers who hate the modern world.
I'm not sure where that leaves me as far as doing anything impactful. Maybe eventually I'll try again to start yet another new project and see if it gets any traction.
At least I have a job that does provide some level of real value, even if it's just entertainment.
Re: Ask HN: What is the most impactful thing you've built?
#576A friend and I built a site and app (latest version of the app with a third friend) for finding public pinball machines to play - https://pinballmap.com/ 14 years later and it’s still going strong!
Re: Ask HN: What is the most impactful thing you've built?
#577Wrote del.icio.us and invented tagging. Echoes of my original design are still around (notably account urls being web.site/userid)
I have always wondered if it could be scaled to a Google alternative. Ranking pages by how many people have bookmarked them seems like a good alternative to PageRank.
Re: Ask HN: What is the most impactful thing you've built?
#578A hotel concierge that’s helped 50 million guests during their stay. The goal is to create unforgettable experiences for a billion people! Ivy sends you a text message introducing herself as a virtual concierge when you check in. She answers FAQs in 1 second using NLP and routes anything more complex to the front desk team for resolution in 2-3 minutes. All in one simple text thread, no apps or UI needed. Guests ofte…
Re: Ask HN: What is the most impactful thing you've built?
#579Re: Ask HN: What is the most impactful thing you've built?
#580In 1995 I (and a few others) designed and built the first WiFi node [1]. At the time there was only one WiFi unit in the world, and it was the one on our bench. It now has about 20 billion descendants. [1] https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1109/40.566198
Awesome. What made it win? Were there any close competitors? Was infrared close to being the winner? I'm also surprised big enough FPGA was already around. Thanks.
Initially, ignoring the wisdom of the time that said OFDM was no good for indoor channels. The research project was eventually shut down due to lack of commercial interest, but the research leaders had enough faith to immediately start their own company (Radiata). Later, commercial success for Radiata came from being in the right place at the right time.
> Were there any close competitors?
In the research phase, not that I was aware of. In the commercial phase, Atheros. The story I was told after the event was that Cisco had decided to buy whichever company came to market first. Radiata came to market 2 weeks before Atheros and so Radiata was acquired.
> Was infrared close to being the winner?
It could have been, but specular reflection in IR channels causes inter-symbol interference, which limits the data rate. If someone could have solved that problem then IR might have happened instead of WiFi.
> I'm also surprised big enough FPGA was already around.
At the start of the project FPGAs were not big enough, so we had to partition across multiple 3000 series Xilinx parts. Bigger FPGAs had been released by the end of the project, so the transmitter fitted on a single XC4025 FPGA, using manual placement. The 4025s were brand new and Xilinx (as always) were difficult to deal with, so we had to beg for devices and they magnanimously granted us 3 or 4 chips.
At the time there wasn't much sense of occasion, as we were busy doing the work and none of us knew how big it would get.