Live data from Hacker News

Twitter removed their diversity page some time between November 16, 2022 and now

web.archive.org

21–30 of 92 posts

Re: Twitter removed their diversity page some time between November 16, 2022 and now

#21

No one there seems to be over 40. I feel excluded, and am being entirely serious here. Also - Twitter have offices in Ireland, don't they? How is religious diversity coming along in the Dublin office? The Catholic-Protestant conflict is less bitter in Dublin than in Belfast, but one cannot pretend discrimination and division is about race everywhere.

Exactly. I see people of both sexes and various shades, who all look the same.

The stupid grins on everyone's face are especially off-putting.

Re: Twitter removed their diversity page some time between November 16, 2022 and now

#22

How about focus on hiring the best people?

Yeah, how about that? Look beyond the Stanford/MIT/Berkeley pipeline, find people who are good, not just part of the techbro club.

Yes, most companies do that. School is weakly correlated with real world performance

Re: Twitter removed their diversity page some time between November 16, 2022 and now

#23

Maybe they realized that 71% of Silicon Valley being foreign-born H1b visa holders isn’t really the best image for ‘diversity’? https://slate.com/technology/2022/11/meta-facebook-layoffs-h... Bonus: almost half of Meta employees are from Asia. Reminds me of a screenshot of WPengines ‘diversity’ pledge on their website that proceeded to state nearly 80% of their staff were female. They changed it not long after.

This last paragraph reminds me of a all hands monthly meeting a while ago during which the DE&I lady reported that we did great with diversity during the past month by hiring ~80% women.

Re: Twitter removed their diversity page some time between November 16, 2022 and now

#24

How about focus on hiring the best people?

Yeah, how about that? Look beyond the Stanford/MIT/Berkeley pipeline, find people who are good, not just part of the techbro club.

Honest question: do hiring managers look at what college an applicant attended? I don't, couldn't care less about your GPA and what not.

Re: Twitter removed their diversity page some time between November 16, 2022 and now

#25
post #6
post #2

Updated the title with November 16th (rather than 11th which is the last date it appears on Wayback Machine) as I was able to narrow it down using Google's Cache: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3Ahttps...

The 25% minorities seems trivial to hit with Asians/Indians and is probably naturally higher than that. But wow on the woman quota, I can’t imagine how easy they had to make those interviews to hit that number.

This is disgustingly sexist. Some of the brightest engineers I know are women. Get that attitude off this forum, it does not belong here.

Re: Twitter removed their diversity page some time between November 16, 2022 and now

#26
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, how about that? Look beyond the Stanford/MIT/Berkeley pipeline, find people who are good, not just part of the techbro club.

Honest question: do hiring managers look at what college an applicant attended? I don't, couldn't care less about your GPA and what not.

Only in passing. It makes no difference in the end

Re: Twitter removed their diversity page some time between November 16, 2022 and now

#27
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the bigger problem here is 50% for women. Mind blowing.

Why is that mind blowing?

Because the pool of male engineers is ~4-8x larger than female candidates, so hiring 50% women is intentionally hiring worse employees because of their genitals.

Re: Twitter removed their diversity page some time between November 16, 2022 and now

#30
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the bigger problem here is 50% for women. Mind blowing.

Why is that mind blowing?

Because it is not representative of the underlying demographics. There are vastly more men trained to work in the field (one representative datapoint: there's an 80/20 gender difference in computer science degrees).

If you are hiring equal numbers of women and men from a talent pool which is 80% male then you are almost certainly illegally discriminating on the basis of a protected class.

Post reply on HN