Live data from Hacker News

US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds

utilitydive.com

161–170 of 200 posts

Re: US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds

#161
post #144

Storage is the bottleneck that makes 100% clean energy even before 2099 unlikely. I recommend the whole video but this part is relevant to my comment: https://youtu.be/ptI6BRVC1Kw?t=108

Imagine saying this 80 years ago about any number of technologies that are cheap and commonplace today.

Re: US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds

#162
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If by NIMBYs you mean paid actors attending council meetings and incredibly loud reactionaries from other places, then yeah. There aren't that many actual NIMBYs for this shit.

Clearly you haven't dealt with the over 60's crowd-who-has-nothing-better-to-do.

There are a lot of those, but there are just as many people who have real objections to fossil fuel and highway expansion plans that get steamrolled through with no consultation.

They're also not the ones funding faux environmental studies that say replacing the coal plume with some solar panels will kill all the frogs, and they're not living in bumfuck nowhere where suddenly 4x the town's population shows up to object to the wind turbine saying it gave them seizures.

The NIMBYism only works if it manufactured and then allowed to work by the people who have actual power over these things (media owners like murdoch and lobbyists). Without that they'd just be tear gassed and told to go around the back alley to the frew speech zones like everyone else.

Re: US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The solution for air conditioners ... more solar power.

Except for those hours 4-9... the solution to that is more storage, a solution which is ready today, shipping, and in demand in excess of current supply, even though supply is ramping up at tremendous speeds.

What if, instead of localized salt reactors, we have hyper local chemical flow batteries.

Re: US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds

#164
post #145
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Eminent domain might overcome NIMBY

If the fashion is to approve of the gov taking our stuff, then that includes your pot too right, you know, like for the clean biofuel plant man?

Eminent domain means that you get paid market price for your stuff.

Re: US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds

#165
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If by NIMBYs you mean paid actors attending council meetings Exactly, most anti-renewable objections are outright fraud by the oil companies, it is groups like 'Citizens for responsible solar' that are recieve fossil fuel donations through shell companies. Theu go and complain that a solar farm will spoint the veiw on somw derelic wasteland and robbing locals of job opportunities ities. There isnt a single local pe…

And what about situations like the following, "‘It’s got nasty’: the battle to build the US’s biggest solar power farm", https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/30/its-got-... Unfortunately, I don't think people like Connie Ehrlich are rare, especially considering that you typically don't need much money to be as obstructive as she has. Yes, there are corporate-funded "grassroots" lobbying organizations, but…

No post body was provided.

Re: US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds

#166

We can have 100% clean energy by 2035 if we assume the US is China and the state can build whatever it wants despite any local objections. And assume we increase battery supply by 40x (even though lithium price is going up dramatically now). And assume that clean power is actually 100% clean. It's good to have a vision for clean energy though that is shared with the country that we start working towards. I can see th…

[deleted]

Re: US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds

#167

We can have 100% clean energy by 2035 if we assume the US is China and the state can build whatever it wants despite any local objections. And assume we increase battery supply by 40x (even though lithium price is going up dramatically now). And assume that clean power is actually 100% clean. It's good to have a vision for clean energy though that is shared with the country that we start working towards. I can see th…

No post body was provided.

Re: US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds

#168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The solution for air conditioners ... more solar power.

Except for those hours 4-9... the solution to that is more storage, a solution which is ready today, shipping, and in demand in excess of current supply, even though supply is ramping up at tremendous speeds.

You can significantly reduce storage requirements by moving the solar peak to 4pm. Just install the solar panels upright rather than flat.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/a-d-possibilities-for-in...

It also impedes other land use even less and can go in places like highway sound barriers.

CSP with thermal storage is also cheaper than storage now in high resource/low cloud areas.

Re: US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds

#169

We can have 100% clean energy by 2035 if we assume the US is China and the state can build whatever it wants despite any local objections. And assume we increase battery supply by 40x (even though lithium price is going up dramatically now). And assume that clean power is actually 100% clean. It's good to have a vision for clean energy though that is shared with the country that we start working towards. I can see th…

Republicans want to burn coal out of sheer spite to own the libs.

Re: US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds

#170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Does an average american live 4 times better than an average frenchman? I don't know about that "4 times better" (how do you measure that, diminishing returns, etc). But your average house in the US is for sure more comfortable than your average house in France.

>> But your average house in the US is for sure more comfortable than your average house in France. "For sure more comfortable"? Like you said though, by what measure? I'm visiting my sister in London right now. She lives in a 750 sqft two bedroom apartment. Sure, it's smaller than my 1700 ft house back in the US, but she seems fairly comfortable.

Yes I know plenty of people who rather live in the big city with all its amenities and interesting people than in a giant house in suburbia. There is a reason why housing prices are so high for the Amsterdam's and New York's of this world.
Post reply on HN