Live data from Hacker News

Earth now weighs six ronnagrams: New metric prefixes voted in

phys.org

11–20 of 215 posts

Re: Earth now weighs six ronnagrams: New metric prefixes voted in

#11
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> However metric prefixes need to be shortened to just their first letter—and B and H were already taken, ruling out bronto and hella.

Cyrillic small be (б) and Greek small chi (χ) could have been used instead.

There are obvious problems with both those prefixes.

Re: Earth now weighs six ronnagrams: New metric prefixes voted in

#12
post #4

Damn, I was really hoping bronto or hella would get some traction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_prefix#Unofficial_prefixe... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hella#SI_prefix

> However metric prefixes need to be shortened to just their first letter—and B and H were already taken, ruling out bronto and hella.

Lessons learned from milli and mega. Oops!

Re: Earth now weighs six ronnagrams: New metric prefixes voted in

#14

A question... Why do humans (or at least engineers) work so well in 1,000? I mean. I use milli/micro/nano/pico as an electrical engineer every day, and it's so intuitive to me. But why three orders of magnitude? Why not two orders, or five?

It's a cultural thing. Chinese (and many more Asian nations) work so well in 10,000, and sometimes, it feels more natural to me as well.

Re: Earth now weighs six ronnagrams: New metric prefixes voted in

#15
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> However metric prefixes need to be shortened to just their first letter—and B and H were already taken, ruling out bronto and hella.

Lessons learned from milli and mega. Oops!

No problem there, SI prefixes are case sensitive. But micro, on the other hand...

Re: Earth now weighs six ronnagrams: New metric prefixes voted in

#17
post #9

I guess that gives us new binary prefixes as well, we can now express data sizes in robibit, quebibit, robibyte and quebibyte!

Will need an update to IEC 80000-13 won't it? Or does the standard define a formula to derive the names from the metric prefixes?

Re: Earth now weighs six ronnagrams: New metric prefixes voted in

#19

A question... Why do humans (or at least engineers) work so well in 1,000? I mean. I use milli/micro/nano/pico as an electrical engineer every day, and it's so intuitive to me. But why three orders of magnitude? Why not two orders, or five?

It's a cultural thing. Chinese (and many more Asian nations) work so well in 10,000, and sometimes, it feels more natural to me as well.

The problem with languages that use 10,000 is they still use commas at 1,000, so you get a very awkward offset that then requires a mental translation between numeric and verbal representations.

Sure if you grow up with it, you have that translation basically hard-coded but it’s still not ideal.

Post reply on HN