Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is the ray of light which exposes the ideological con taking place: trust between machines isnt trust in an economic sense. Centralisation of power has nothing to do with computer network decentralisation. The scam here is, at first, ideological. There's a techbro-libertarian wordplay taking place which must be exposed. The blockchain has nothing to offer "trust", "contracts", "rights", "rewards". Nothing. And muc…
I think you should get a basic understanding of the technology if you are going to comment on it.
Nor do I understand anything at all about systems of power, accountability, the political intuitions of the state and the economy. I've no idea how central banks regulate the supply of money; i'm totally at a loss as to how trust in the ability for people to keep their promises is the guarantor of the value of money. I'm bamboozled by financial risk, and have no idea how productive economic systems create value by taking bets on economically productive activity.
Rather, I'm a rube. I've been told that when you plug computers together and copy-paste cryptographic ledgers then we can get rid of The Fed. So that's what I choose to believe.