Healthcare feels like something that should be a regulated monopoly if not provided by the government. Profiting off the misfortune of others seems a bit dirty.
I'd say it's cruel . Paying interest on some medical procedure because you (and likely almost everyone else) cannot afford the eye-watering cost? What else do we need to convince people that this is not sustainable? Maybe a collapse in this medical loan market? One has to assume the major players (hospitals, insurance, etc) have firewalled themselves from this system.
That won't properly highlight the issue. It's just a financial shell game of bailouts and buying and selling of paper. It doesn't impact the patients. It's not ideal but the only solution is for the patient to be rejected for insufficient funds/inability to pay. Then, when people finally realize they can't get a doctor appointment because they literally can not afford healthcare in our current system, they will expect the government to provide it.
What's funny/ironic to me is that people that are against single payor in the US always like to point to other non-US countries and say how care is restricted or people with cancer/needing surgery are on a long waiting list, etc. I don't know if that's even true but we've all heard it somewhere by now and it becomes a part of their truth (not unlike like politics). And it's what they're most afraid of, being cut out... when not being able to afford something is the very definition of being cut out.