Live data from Hacker News

Is this the end of crypto?

economist.com

81–90 of 448 posts

Re: Is this the end of crypto?

#81
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good government is a luxury many lack.

And that's a fair point. But the problem is Crypto is an investment playground by people from rich countries and legitimate uses of it in countries like say Venezuela is an extremely small part of total transactions.

The US dollar is used for shady stuff all over the world, but we’re not trying to ban it.

Re: Is this the end of crypto?

#84

Fundamental issues of cryptocurrency economy: 1. Biggest pushers are seemingly tech-bros from FANG companies. These companies are laying off staff in record numbers. The biggest cryptocoin believers therefore, will have less income than ever before (in ~3 months or so, after their severance is paid, they'll have to start drawing on savings if they didn't get a job yet... and getting a job in this economy is going to…

No post body was provided.

Re: Is this the end of crypto?

#85
Most crypto-related projects are scams or money-rushes. But SOME will survive and be built after this with all of the learnings of the past few years. This is all very reminiscent of the dot com crash and how media was talking about the internet during the crash. If things follow that same path for crypto, this is really just the beginning of crypto.

Re: Is this the end of crypto?

#86

Fundamental issues of cryptocurrency economy: 1. Biggest pushers are seemingly tech-bros from FANG companies. These companies are laying off staff in record numbers. The biggest cryptocoin believers therefore, will have less income than ever before (in ~3 months or so, after their severance is paid, they'll have to start drawing on savings if they didn't get a job yet... and getting a job in this economy is going to…

ETH validators are around 8% right now, not 5%.

The 'risk' is that the developers don't successfully implement withdrawal or that the whole network goes down. Two, imho, huge risks and part of the reason I don't personally stake at this time. That said, eip-1559 and 'the merge' did happen, without much of a hitch at all, which are pretty major accomplishments. Confidence in the developers is a bit higher now as a result.

source: validator rewards section of https://ultrasound.money/

Re: Is this the end of crypto?

#87
I think more than anything, this has made a16z and Sequoia lose all their merit and credibility. They are now no more than some sneaky crypto grifters who can sneak off to Argentina or Dubai and their ideas and thoughts have zero intellectual value.

Re: Is this the end of crypto?

#88
Here's how I see it:

Crypto as an investment - Not your keys, not your coin.

Crypto as a currency - I can't directly buy food, water, shelter, transportation, energy, or anything fundamental with it.

I know acceptance is growing, but 10+ years later, crypto still has extremely limited acceptance for daily goods and services. It is almost exclusively held as an investment.

Re: Is this the end of crypto?

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a user of Bitcoin and I never used any exchange.

Genuine question: How do you use it? Do you mean you use it to make purchases, or do you mean you hold it as a store of value, and that's the use? Something else?

I don't hold Bitcoin. I use it for cross-continent transactions. I buy it from people in my city using a local FB group or (way in the past) Localbitcoins.com and then send it to the recipient. They usually use Localbitcoins to convert it to their own currency AFAIK. The fees (transfer and exchange) are much lower this way - usually less than 0.5% all things considered. Compared to $100+ fee to just transfer the money + 5-10% currency exchange fee (both my and the recipient's currency aren't the most well known).

Re: Is this the end of crypto?

#90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's irrelevant to the comment you're responding to. The point is that there may be people who use it rationally, but how it works in the real world now that it's leaking out beyond its initial user base is getting really problematic.

It works in real world without any exchanges. All of them could crash and burn and Bitcoin would continue on.

Sure, for the 2,000 people who use it without exchanges. (made up number)
Post reply on HN