Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
11–20 of 401 posts
Re: Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
#12SBF is monumentally stupid for sending these messages. Straight up admitting that any "ethics" was for reputation only. And not only that, but saying that the mistake was not doubling down again.
If his texts are normally similar to this, how did anyone serious think this guy was brilliant?
Re: Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
#13Re: Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
#14Re: Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
#15This seems like a weird thing to worry about right now, I imagine my question would be "hey, where'd all the deposits go?" Like, I'm sure it's all interesting in a psychological and sociological way, but "what does SBF really believe" feels like it should take a back seat to what did he do. That's much more interesting! It's easy for someone like SBF to just say stuff about what's going on in his head, whether it's true or not. But, we're talking about real (and, okay, a lot of fake) money here.
There's this weird assumption in a lot of reporting that a rich person must have interesting things to say, or beliefs that are worth getting to the bottom of. Sometimes that's true, but sometimes they're just not very interesting people. Which is fine! Lots of people aren't very interesting, but really rich people get to be treated as interesting even if they're actually boring.
Re: Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
#16Re: Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
#17Jesus Christ…does this guy not know that you should keep quiet when you’re the subject of a criminal investigation from multiple government agencies?
Re: Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
#18Jesus Christ…does this guy not know that you should keep quiet when you’re the subject of a criminal investigation from multiple government agencies?
Re: Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
#19SBF is monumentally stupid for sending these messages. Straight up admitting that any "ethics" was for reputation only. And not only that, but saying that the mistake was not doubling down again.