Quoted post unavailable.
Mom handcuffed, jailed for 8-year-old son walking half a mile
51–60 of 763 posts
Re: Mom handcuffed, jailed for 8-year-old son walking half a mile
#52> Waco, Texas What? If this draconian policy is happening in Texas, the land of the free, can I assume it's even worse in the rest of North America? I hope Texans are up-in-arms about this government overreach.
That state has a lot of distortions and issues. The only "freedom" that exists is around ensuring the NRA keeps making huge profits.
Re: Mom handcuffed, jailed for 8-year-old son walking half a mile
#53Vaguely relevant, from Peter Grey's book "Free to Learn": > In our culture today, parents and other adults overprotect children from possible dangers in play. We seriously underestimate children’s ability to take care of themselves and make good judgments [...] Our underestimation becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy—by depriving children of freedom, we deprive them of the opportunities they need to learn how to take c…
Nobody wants to be the one parent out of a thousand who has their kid scooped up off the street because they were letting their kid explore and be free. Edit: Not sure why I'm being downvoted, this comment isn't a judgment on anyone or promoting any type of child-rearing philosophy. It's just an obvious truth. Nobody wants to be that parent, and that obviously influences behavior.
Re: Mom handcuffed, jailed for 8-year-old son walking half a mile
#54In my twice-the-size European city, kids walk twice that distance to school and back home again, alone. Every. Single. Day. If this place isn't safe enough for kids to walk by themselves, maybe the question should be raised whether the police and municipal government really is doing their job the way they're supposed to.
Re: Mom handcuffed, jailed for 8-year-old son walking half a mile
#55Re: Mom handcuffed, jailed for 8-year-old son walking half a mile
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
There will always be people who overreact and call the police for inappropriate reasons. That isn't the problem. The problem is that the police, and then the DA, chose to make this a criminal matter. Either of them could and should have dismissed the issue after verifying that the child was not being put into a harmful environment.
Correct! There's a lot of crazy people out in the world who'll call the cops for all manner of things. The correct response would have been to ignore the call following a couple questions by the 911 operator. "Is the child in danger in any way?" the response would be "No." and then hang up on them.
After informing them, that unlike childs walking outside, abuse of 911 is a real crime.
Re: Mom handcuffed, jailed for 8-year-old son walking half a mile
#57Re: Mom handcuffed, jailed for 8-year-old son walking half a mile
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
There will always be people who overreact and call the police for inappropriate reasons. That isn't the problem. The problem is that the police, and then the DA, chose to make this a criminal matter. Either of them could and should have dismissed the issue after verifying that the child was not being put into a harmful environment.
Don't forget about the child safety services/social workers - they should have to be reasonable too.
Re: Mom handcuffed, jailed for 8-year-old son walking half a mile
#59Re: Mom handcuffed, jailed for 8-year-old son walking half a mile
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
There will always be people who overreact and call the police for inappropriate reasons. That isn't the problem. The problem is that the police, and then the DA, chose to make this a criminal matter. Either of them could and should have dismissed the issue after verifying that the child was not being put into a harmful environment.
> There will always be people who overreact and call the police for inappropriate reasons. That isn't the problem. It's not the problem, but it is a problem. There's no reason we shouldn't try to work on both. > The problem is that the police, and then the DA, chose to make this a criminal matter. Either of them could and should have dismissed the issue after verifying that the child was not being put into a harmful…