SOPA Hearings Delayed, 140,000 Americans watched the hearings
11–20 of 64 posts
Re: SOPA Hearings Delayed, 140,000 Americans watched the hearings
#12During that time we should compile a list of all representatives that support this bill and any/all donations and from whom those donations came from to support this bill. When the money trail is out in the open, I think both the representatives and the donors may be more timid about pushing forward against an unpopular bill like this.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111203/00494716961/some-d...
Re: SOPA Hearings Delayed, 140,000 Americans watched the hearings
#13Is there a list of representatives that support this bill anywhere? Just so voters know which people and political parties to never vote for again.
Re: SOPA Hearings Delayed, 140,000 Americans watched the hearings
#14Is there a list of representatives that support this bill anywhere? Just so voters know which people and political parties to never vote for again.
I prefer not to decide to withdraw my vote until they cast theirs. And even then, I honestly would rather not withdraw my vote until I've discussed the matter with the relevant congressperson and found out what their reasoning was. If they can make a reasoned argument, I will reconsider. Merely disagreeing with my congressperson is not enough for me to withdraw my vote, because it's a given that I will disagree with…
I think supporting SOPA proves that they are not willing to listen to reason.
Re: SOPA Hearings Delayed, 140,000 Americans watched the hearings
#15More on ACTA:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/11/acta-trade-...
Re: SOPA Hearings Delayed, 140,000 Americans watched the hearings
#16(Although we have a bigger problem in the EU right now - ACTA is about to be signed by the Commission, Parliament vote pending in a couple of weeks.)
Big thumbs up for Congressmen Issa (R-CA), Polis (D-CO), Lofgren (D-CA) and Chaffetz (R-UT) for their performance. Remember those names if you vote in their districts.
Re: SOPA Hearings Delayed, 140,000 Americans watched the hearings
#17Smith seems to be Public Enemy #1 on this issue, and I believe he represents a part of Texas with some tech presence (Austin). There may be others who are good targets as well...if the message is "support this anti-technology bill and you'll lose your job", maybe other Congresspeople will think twice about supporting MPAA-written legislation.
(Or maybe they won't. But we won't know unless we try.)
Re: SOPA Hearings Delayed, 140,000 Americans watched the hearings
#18Looks like while the SOPA was delayed in USA, ACTA was just signed in EU: http://bit.ly/sVF07v More on ACTA: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/11/acta-trade-... https://www.eff.org/issues/acta http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBWLVbcjq50
The Parliament is a separate matter. I think they're just going into holiday recess, then in January they'll vote Schultz as the new Speaker and then they'll vote on ACTA.
There's still a chance to stop it, especially since the Parliament is more skeptical. Contact your representatives in the EU Parliament and threaten to vote for someone else in the next election if they support this oppressive Act!!!
Re: SOPA Hearings Delayed, 140,000 Americans watched the hearings
#19 " ...and routes around it! "Re: SOPA Hearings Delayed, 140,000 Americans watched the hearings
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
I prefer not to decide to withdraw my vote until they cast theirs. And even then, I honestly would rather not withdraw my vote until I've discussed the matter with the relevant congressperson and found out what their reasoning was. If they can make a reasoned argument, I will reconsider. Merely disagreeing with my congressperson is not enough for me to withdraw my vote, because it's a given that I will disagree with…
> If they are not willing to listen to reason, my support is out the window immediately. I think supporting SOPA proves that they are not willing to listen to reason.