Earlier quoted context omitted.
>If he fires all the engineers with a bad attitude Where I work it's in the contract that you don't talk shit about the company on social media. I think that's common sense too. I'm sure Elon is an irritating piece of shit, especially as a superior, but shit-flinging online like this is just not something I'd want in my company either.
Well, Elon is the one talking shit about the company. She was, on the other hand, praising the infra, and talking shit only about the CEO.
Twitter Android app dev fired: Guess it's official now.
191–200 of 219 posts
Re: Twitter Android app dev fired: Guess it's official now.
#192Re: Twitter Android app dev fired: Guess it's official now.
#193Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Definitely a career limiting move, if not potentially career ending. She is already receiving job offers, so how could you possibly come to that ridiculous conclusion?
Of course she’s receiving generous offers from the ‘hurr durr Elon bad’ crowd. The career limitation is that most people just aren’t in that crowd. That doesn’t necessarily mean they’re licking Elons boots, it could also mean they don’t care at all or that they are somewhere in the middle. I’m not in a hiring position but if I were I’d avoid her because I don’t want to import drama into my environment.
Re: Twitter Android app dev fired: Guess it's official now.
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
He literally cancelled her. Got her fired from her own job because of a tweet. It's exactly the intolerance he complains of.
No, actions have consequences but he has not prevented her from saying what she wanted to say.
Literally the exact thing Elon Musks complains about except it's when someone on his side of the culture war that becomes a victim.
Re: Twitter Android app dev fired: Guess it's official now.
#195The context here is that the engineer in question challenged Musk's (public) claims about why Twitter is so slow (there's followup tweets in the thread with more detail): https://twitter.com/EricFrohnhoefer/status/15919022854034186... So Musk then fired him with a Tweet: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1592186302379982849
Hope the thread is archived somewhere, because these tweets aren't going to stay up for very long. The "free speech absolutist" will see to that.
Re: Twitter Android app dev fired: Guess it's official now.
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
>If he fires all the engineers with a bad attitude Where I work it's in the contract that you don't talk shit about the company on social media. I think that's common sense too. I'm sure Elon is an irritating piece of shit, especially as a superior, but shit-flinging online like this is just not something I'd want in my company either.
Well, Elon is the one talking shit about the company. She was, on the other hand, praising the infra, and talking shit only about the CEO.
Re: Twitter Android app dev fired: Guess it's official now.
#197Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, Elon is the one talking shit about the company. She was, on the other hand, praising the infra, and talking shit only about the CEO.
CEO is part of the company.
Re: Twitter Android app dev fired: Guess it's official now.
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
His posts and account are still up. Free speech does not mean freedom from consequences
So a dictator jailing a dissident because what he said in social media is still considered a Free speech act?
Re: Twitter Android app dev fired: Guess it's official now.
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
His posts and account are still up. Free speech does not mean freedom from consequences
That’s a bit of a thought terminating clique, imo. If the only consequence for saying something reasonable but contentious is unpopularity then you have free speech, but if you can be punished (banned from a public platform, or fired from a job) then you don’t. Freedom doesn’t mean “the right to” (that’s “liberty”) - freedom has to be “effectively exercisable”, and that requires limitation on any unjust consequences.
Re: Twitter Android app dev fired: Guess it's official now.
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
I still believe that his insistence on only using computer vision for Tesla’s self driving was profoundly wrong. I got my ivy-league graduate degree in a related field right around the time when he probably was making the decision (2015) and it was obvious to everyone around me that we are not even close to having the kind of generic, reliable CV you would need for a car. Obviously, in grant proposals and papers we p…
Considering I have been in situations with zero optical visibility, I am frankly baffled he thought that removing sensors including ultrasonics which are cheap as chips, was a good idea
At that point, you can either (A) stop selling models that you actually make a profit from and risk your top spot on Forbe's billionaires list or (B) claim that "full self driving" really meant "driver assistance" this whole time [2] and cut whatever hardware isn't absolutely necessary to meet your lowered standard.
Elon chose option B - I suspect through some mix of self-delusion about the capabilities of automated statistics and knowing that he can continue to push the deadline for "full self driving" back another decade and pivot after his competitors have pushed the cost of radar/LIDAR down far enough.
[1]: https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna12040753
[2]: https://www.insidehook.com/article/vehicles/controversy-tesl...