Live data from Hacker News

In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens, 1949–2011

vanityfair.com

61–70 of 228 posts

Re: In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens, 1949–2011

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't mean to sound petty or ungrateful for the link, but is there some other source of this, one that is visible outside of the US? Even better would be if it didn't require Flash.

This one is visible outside of the US. Though maybe not everywhere.

Canada doesn't count! ;-p

edit (since it won't let me reply) - sorry, I meant Canada doesn't count as 'Outside the US'. Bad humour, no biscuit.

Re: In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens, 1949–2011

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"So, with all due respect, I hope he is wrong in his beliefs about the after life because if there is a heaven he's surely earned his place in it." "all due respect" cannot change the fact that this is the most disrespectful thing you can write at the death of an atheist.

No it's not. Why wouldn't an atheist want an afterlife?

I can't speak for others, but this atheist doesn't want one.

Re: In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens, 1949–2011

#63

Hitchens was essentially a Marxist (by his own admission) who was also in favor of the U.S. invasion of Iraq and the foreign policy it represented. So there was very little I agreed with him on. But I'm terribly upset about this and I'll tell you why. Because of his willingness to debate. I'd literally scan right wing talk radio schedules for his name because you just knew it would be a great show. In a world where s…

"So, with all due respect, I hope he is wrong in his beliefs about the after life because if there is a heaven he's surely earned his place in it." "all due respect" cannot change the fact that this is the most disrespectful thing you can write at the death of an atheist.

"I think that guy has a place in heaven" is much less disrespectful to an atheist than "fuck that guy, he's a bastard". It's an acknowledgement of a noble opponent.

Re: In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens, 1949–2011

#64
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You know, I think it's really distasteful that you people use the deaths of people who probably wouldn't have even agreed with the message of that essay to promote the ideas in that essay.

He went in for cancer treatment, so he clearly wanted to avoid death, which is what the essay is about.

Christopher is largely dismissive of the life-extension techniques that transhumanists espouse, such as cryogenic preservation: http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2010/11/hitchens-...

Re: In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens, 1949–2011

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"So, with all due respect, I hope he is wrong in his beliefs about the after life because if there is a heaven he's surely earned his place in it." "all due respect" cannot change the fact that this is the most disrespectful thing you can write at the death of an atheist.

No it's not. Why wouldn't an atheist want an afterlife?

Because we don't need it. Our genes are reproduced and they are carrying the best and the worst parts of us and our experience.

Re: In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens, 1949–2011

#66
post #41

Okay, really. With all due respect to the passing of a fellow human, this story has absolutely nothing to do with hackers, with software development, with the startup business... I know people are going to reply to this with some reference to "but it is of intellectual interest!" -- but really, there are lots of different places on the Internet (thousands, maybe millions!) to discuss lots of different things. If you…

Hitchens was one of those people that teaches other people how to think better. That classes him as 'of interest' to both tech and business.

Re: In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens, 1949–2011

#67
As a person of long-held religious conviction I am deeply saddened to see this worthy adversary go. He had an uncanny ability to go straight for your mostly deeply held beliefs with the most trenchant rhetoric and yet somehow made you like him anyway.

I think it's because with Hitchens, you knew he spoke from the integrity of his own convictions. He was nobody's man, on no one's bandwagon, carrying water for no political agenda other than his own desire to see the world become a better place. His libertarianism or Marxism was just a function of where his own intellect led him, and he never compromised for fashion or acceptance. That gave him gravitas, ethos. How else could you go after Mother Theresa and not get run out of...the World on a rail?

Only Hitchens. He was often compared to Orwell and H.L. Mencken, and he was one of the few writers for whom the comparison was as a peer rather than a distant echo of a greater time. Who will pick up his mantle? Who has the intellect, wit or courage of their convictions that compares with Hitchens?

At the moment I simply can't think of anyone.

Re: In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens, 1949–2011

#69

Hitchens was essentially a Marxist (by his own admission) who was also in favor of the U.S. invasion of Iraq and the foreign policy it represented. So there was very little I agreed with him on. But I'm terribly upset about this and I'll tell you why. Because of his willingness to debate. I'd literally scan right wing talk radio schedules for his name because you just knew it would be a great show. In a world where s…

>Hitchens was essentially a Marxist

On history, yes, on economics, no. See his answer to the question of his Marxism:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbJR2HN5V9c&feature=relat...

Re: In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens, 1949–2011

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it's not. Why wouldn't an atheist want an afterlife?

Because we don't need it. Our genes are reproduced and they are carrying the best and the worst parts of us and our experience.

Your children carries your experiences?
Post reply on HN