Live data from Hacker News

FTX investor Sequoia removed its glowing profile of Sam Bankman-Fried

businessinsider.com

161–170 of 196 posts

Re: FTX investor Sequoia removed its glowing profile of Sam Bankman-Fried

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is Alameda's CEO. https://youtu.be/aW6SqLXw944 Un fucking believable.

She's not any younger or more awkward than Vitalik Buterin and many people consider that guy to be some sort of boy-genius.

"Maverick boy genius that shatters conventional wisdom" is a well-established media trope, with decades worth of films and TV shows priming people into thinking that is plausible.

Women's stories as told in the media often come with a "unrecognized in her time" narrative that isn't quite as gripping.

Combine that with the hero worship common among the "college is a scam / audit the Fed" demographic AND their Dunning-Krueger multiplier effect of social media-based marketing, and you've got yourself a very distorted picture of reality.

Re: FTX investor Sequoia removed its glowing profile of Sam Bankman-Fried

#162

I would have been embarrassed to release it in the first case even if FTX were doing great. The investors were impressed that SBF was playing League of Legends during a fundraising meeting. They thought it was a good thing.

Back in my day you just had to show up to a pitch meeting in a hoodie.

Re: FTX investor Sequoia removed its glowing profile of Sam Bankman-Fried

#164

He will get away clean.

"Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes should spend 15 years in prison and pay $800 million in restitution to investors defrauded in the blood testing start-up, U.S. prosecutors recommended late on Friday. "The Department of Justice recommendation, made in a court filing, came as Holmes prepares to be sentenced next week." https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-seeks-15-years-elizabeth...

Healthcare is regulated much more closely, and Theranos broke a number of laws. Also, she never absconded and faced trial. Rumours are swirling that SBF is no longer on US soil.

Re: FTX investor Sequoia removed its glowing profile of Sam Bankman-Fried

#165

What is striking about the Sam Bankman-Fried case is that for a long time he was considered to be one of the few who really knew what he was doing and also an advocate for more regulation. It appears to have been a smoke screen, given the financial fragility of his multiple companies, he could not have been looking for more scrutiny and regulation, he was playing Poker with politicians and his competitors. Same with…

> ... he was playing Poker with politicians and his competitors.

With his competitors certainly. And Binance, which may or may not be as corrupt as FTX, called FTX's bluff. If CZ is a scammer too (I don't know about that [1]), he wouldn't go down while handling the market to another scammer. So poker with Binance: I agree.

Poker with Coinbase (which I think and hope are legit) too, who patiently waited, with higher fees and way less promises, while the Luna/Terra/BlockFi were offering 8% APY returns "because geniuses".

But saying: "playing poker with politicians" while they received $40 m is a very gentle way to put it. He was very likely downright bribing politicians and several people at the SEC and (ex-)CTFC (which a US congressman is saying allegedly happened).

These "elites" should be behind bars.

That's the real story here.

> Why? This is not the first time. > > Enron, Worldcom, Theranos, Madoff, Nikola, to name a few...

Exactly. It's not about cryptocurrencies. It's not something Satoshi Nakamoto planned.

A thousand years ago these politicians and SEC officials would have been hanged, drawn and quartered for high treason towards the state. Nowadays, because we live in in a modern society were justice reigns, these politicans and SEC officials are going behind bars.

Except it's not going to happen.

In french there's an old saying: "En prison, en prison pour incompetence".

Which means: "In jail, in jail for incompetence".

Even if these politicians and officials play the "I didn't know" card, I still think they should be behind bars for their sheer ineptitude.

It's an impossible task to be ruled by such dumbasses.

Re: FTX investor Sequoia removed its glowing profile of Sam Bankman-Fried

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is Alameda's CEO. https://youtu.be/aW6SqLXw944 Un fucking believable.

She's not any younger or more awkward than Vitalik Buterin and many people consider that guy to be some sort of boy-genius.

From what I’ve seen of Vitalik Buterin‘s stuff he goes deep diving into subjects and doesn’t leap until it’s clear to him it isn’t going to blow up in a spectacular fashion.

I don’t particularly care about what he gets up to but I don’t think he has any bad intentions behind what he does.

On the other hand, having an adversity to risk might be a positive thing if you’re illegally investing other peoples’ money.

Re: FTX investor Sequoia removed its glowing profile of Sam Bankman-Fried

#168
post #139

The bit about him playing League of Legends during a meeting with Sequoia reads like something straight out of Silicon Valley.

Perhaps Mike Judge should be running a VC firm, instead of simply writing the playbook for future conmen.

Anyone who watches Silicon Valley and uses it as a blueprint to start a successful VS firm deserves to keep that money, tbf. That show is a straight up mockery of the tech world.

Re: FTX investor Sequoia removed its glowing profile of Sam Bankman-Fried

#169

He will get away clean.

"Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes should spend 15 years in prison and pay $800 million in restitution to investors defrauded in the blood testing start-up, U.S. prosecutors recommended late on Friday. "The Department of Justice recommendation, made in a court filing, came as Holmes prepares to be sentenced next week." https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-seeks-15-years-elizabeth...

[deleted]

Re: FTX investor Sequoia removed its glowing profile of Sam Bankman-Fried

#170
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IANAL. What's his defense?

I worked for an investment company that lost a lot of money once. The first thing we did was go visit the lawyer, who provided great relief for my boss. Basically as long as you haven't broken the law or the contracts, you're ok. It's no different from "I bought some stuff that lost money". That's the defense. I don't know anything about that rather large caveat in this case, but for that old boss it was clear since…

They weren’t running an investment house but an exchange.

Investments come with inherent and stated risks and if you lose money, well, you knew the risks.

Post reply on HN