Live data from Hacker News

FTX faces potential hack, sees mysterious outflows totaling more than $600M

coindesk.com

211–220 of 890 posts

Re: FTX faces potential hack, sees mysterious outflows totaling more than $600M

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This isn't a crypto failure. Crypto works. This is a human failure. FTX didn't collapse because of the technology. It collapsed because of human error. The fix is rather simple. If an organization looks like a bank and quacks like a bank; it should be regulated like a bank.

> This is a human failure Is there any crypto out there without humans ? Is there an undo button to reverse the transaction? All financial systems involve humans

There is the same undo button that exists for every other financial institution that commits fraud: lawsuits.

Re: FTX faces potential hack, sees mysterious outflows totaling more than $600M

#212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> it should be regulated like a bank And how would they implement KYC/AML regulations which are fundamental to banking ?

By force, if necessary.

No technically. There are seemingly endless ways to move funds anonymously.

Re: FTX faces potential hack, sees mysterious outflows totaling more than $600M

#213

Regardless of whether you are pro- or anti- crypto, the collapse of FTX, SBF's bubble bursting in a rather extreme fashion, and now this hack are more nails in the coffin for mainstream support. I am no fan of crypto myself, but it's interesting to think what would have to happen for crypto to burnish its image. Would key people have to voluntarily form some sort of coordinating council and self-regulate? Would they…

I actually see this as an opportunity for the established financial companies to insert themselves into the ecosystem, using their established reputation, processes, and adherence to traditional bank regulation as a 'trust' base that's been both lacking permanently and (whatever was there) eroded over the last 12 months. Both exchanges and coins / tokens are going at what looks like very cheap right now.

>Their established reputation

The reason trustless decentralized crypto currencies were invented: So we don't have to rely on banking corporation's glowing reputations.

Re: FTX faces potential hack, sees mysterious outflows totaling more than $600M

#214

This is absolutely wild and unprecedented. Imagine being a victim of Madoff's ponzi and - after already being traumatized by the unveiling of the fraud - discovering that the rest of the money had been stolen. Madoff's ponzi was larger, but the recovery rate was 88%. It looks like customers who didn't withdraw in time will end up with 0%.

Can confirm. Lost 100% of my mtgox holdings in 2013. Theoretically my account balance is 7.73 BTC. I can still log in and see it. Maybe by the time I retire I’ll have recovered like 0.7 BTC. Which amusingly would be the sum of my original $11k investment. A lot of this is just gambling. People need to go into it with the mindset that the money will be gone tomorrow, and then be pleasantly surprised if it doesn’t. See…

If you've been keeping up with your claim filings you should get around 1.1 to 1.25 BTC (estimate from https://blog.wizsec.jp/2021/02/mtgox-claim-calculator.html?m...)

Re: FTX faces potential hack, sees mysterious outflows totaling more than $600M

#215
post #208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree that the algorithms powering crypto are sophisticated pieces of technology. Just look at the zero-knowledge proofs. The thing is that "not being regulated like a bank" is exactly what many people like / liked about it. (Yield farming, using DeFi for mortgages, etc.) What I'm saying is that Crypto seems to be headed to being taught alongside, if not the Therac-25, then the Mars Climate Orbiter (which was lost…

If there were a clear and well-regulated equivalent of Tether, with obvious and transparent dollar-backing, I suspect it would find a lot of usage. Might cost $1.15 to mint a new USD-coin redeemable for $1.00, but I suspect there would be an appetite. Massive volatility and the occasional collapse of a crypto-bank are probably hindering the appetite of many people for anything in the crypto market. That population pr…

Right now stablecoins are a pretty profitable business because of interest rates.

An attestation report available 24/7 should be generated easily if you’re doing things properly, as well as frictionless burning and minting.

Note: I work for Glo, a non-profit stablecoin, so have a vested interest in this space. I do not and am not speaking on behalf of our group.

Re: FTX faces potential hack, sees mysterious outflows totaling more than $600M

#217

Regardless of whether you are pro- or anti- crypto, the collapse of FTX, SBF's bubble bursting in a rather extreme fashion, and now this hack are more nails in the coffin for mainstream support. I am no fan of crypto myself, but it's interesting to think what would have to happen for crypto to burnish its image. Would key people have to voluntarily form some sort of coordinating council and self-regulate? Would they…

I'd be curious to read anyone's thoughts on what would have to happen for crypto to improve its image at this point. Would being regulated exactly like traditional banking / finance be enough? More regulation? Would it be regulation + lower rates of fraud, hacks, collapse, and abuse? Or something else I'm not thinking of?

Depositor Insurance probably... But still, every single promise has been burnt in the crypto world.

Re: FTX faces potential hack, sees mysterious outflows totaling more than $600M

#218
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FTX is a centralized entity, just like PayPal is. There is no such difference. As a centralized company, they are supposed to hold all customer funds in their own bank/wallet/whatever account(s).

iait may be centralized but there's no comparison to PayPal. PayPal does not commingle funds

[deleted]

Re: FTX faces potential hack, sees mysterious outflows totaling more than $600M

#219

Regardless of whether you are pro- or anti- crypto, the collapse of FTX, SBF's bubble bursting in a rather extreme fashion, and now this hack are more nails in the coffin for mainstream support. I am no fan of crypto myself, but it's interesting to think what would have to happen for crypto to burnish its image. Would key people have to voluntarily form some sort of coordinating council and self-regulate? Would they…

This isn't a crypto failure. Crypto works. This is a human failure. FTX didn't collapse because of the technology. It collapsed because of human error. The fix is rather simple. If an organization looks like a bank and quacks like a bank; it should be regulated like a bank.

All crypto currencies are a ponzi scheme. Change my mind.

Re: FTX faces potential hack, sees mysterious outflows totaling more than $600M

#220
post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> where all of the fraud occurs Might want to look into the rug-pulling with shitcoins, NFTs etc. That is far more insidious since it is targeted at young adults/children by influencers such as Jake Paul, Lil Uzi, David Dobrik etc.

Yes, smart contracts can be programmed to allow terrible human behavior. Banks also have this feature. But... they can also be programmed NOT to allow terrible human behavior. Banks do not have this feature.

Banks interact with the legal system at every level.

So yes there maybe terrible human behaviour at times but very quickly it results in either (a) people being fined or going to jail or (b) laws improving to prevent it e.g. KYC/AML.

Also as someone who works at a bank there is a lot of code which governs what people can and can't do.

Post reply on HN