Is algae the new kale?
211–220 of 320 posts
Re: Is algae the new kale?
#212Quoted post unavailable.
Eating seaweed and bugs sounds a lot better than starving to death? Especially since in both cases they appear to be just intermediate sources of nutrients that will get turned into innocuous food-a-likes like burgers and bacon. Sure, the cynical take is no one would willing eat them straight up (though obviously nori is around sushi, hijiki is in soup etc.) but I am not too put off by the idea...
Re: Is algae the new kale?
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
B12 absorption is finicky, and meats contain rather small amounts. Injections and sublinguals are actually better at increasing levels than meat.
Organ meats such as beef liver provide a significant amount of B12. If you are just eating muscle meat, then you will have to eat a lot.
Re: Is algae the new kale?
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
What breeds did you have?
First time was a Beefalo crossed on a Jersey cow. Second time was a White-faced Hereford crossed on the same cow.
Hereford are good but they're a proper "good old-fashioned roast beef Sunday dinner" breed.
We mostly had Charolais crosses, and Luing cattle which you don't really see outside Scotland. They're smallish but the meat is amazing.
Re: Is algae the new kale?
#215I was looking into algea/spirulina for B12, but found some sources indicating it is not a bioavailable form of B12, and also prevents real B12 from being absorbed. I'd be interested to know any counter research to this. > almost all algae revealed vitamin B12 analogues instead of the real thing. Analogues are not only ineffective, but also potentially dangerous. Most researchers have consequently dismissed algae as a…
Yep. People need meat.
So why not just take B12 supplements ourselves? Cut out the middleman and as a bonus lower stress on our biosphere and reduce our carbon footprint.
Re: Is algae the new kale?
#216I was looking into algea/spirulina for B12, but found some sources indicating it is not a bioavailable form of B12, and also prevents real B12 from being absorbed. I'd be interested to know any counter research to this. > almost all algae revealed vitamin B12 analogues instead of the real thing. Analogues are not only ineffective, but also potentially dangerous. Most researchers have consequently dismissed algae as a…
But I also wouldn’t shun algae just because they occupy some B12 transporters. There’s all kinds of metabolic tradeoffs with every kind of food, and we are designed to tolerate that. Most metabolic pathways are 4-5x redundant IIRC.
Re: Is algae the new kale?
#217Edit: since, I'm getting downvoted, here's a study:
Re: Is algae the new kale?
#218Re: Is algae the new kale?
#219I think Amway is still selling those tablets in some countries now.
Re: Is algae the new kale?
#220Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yep. People need meat.
For B12? You do know that animals don’t produce B12, but microorganisms (that can be found in soil and untreated water) and that farmed animals eat B12 supplemented food? So no, people don’t need meat. Not for B12, or for proteins or for iron or for anything else. Do people want to eat meat? That’s a different story.