Live data from Hacker News

FTX to file for U.S. bankruptcy, CEO resigns

reuters.com

461–470 of 1001 posts

Re: FTX to file for U.S. bankruptcy, CEO resigns

#461
post #28

Was this another CEO "taking all responsibility" without any actual responsiblity/penalties? Not counting resigning.

I will bet you cash money that this is one CEO you’ll see in prison. This is like 10x as bad as anything Elizabeth Holmes did, and as far as I know, she wasn’t tweeting real time as the walls were closing in on her.

Re: FTX to file for U.S. bankruptcy, CEO resigns

#463
I'm not a luddite (on hacker news lol) and I can clearly see the revolutionary potential of blockchain. But, for the love of God, can we STOP the blind short-term speculation on the promise of extreme wealth. Moderate investment can support development without the kind of hype that ruins lives and sullies public perception of the technology.

Re: FTX to file for U.S. bankruptcy, CEO resigns

#464
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am still not convinced that he did not steal the missing FTX client funds. So at this point it is not clear to me how much he lost or gained from this. I do hope the DOJ conduct a full investigation and trace where all the money went.

I assume all those political donations bought something :)

well, they're not giving the donations back, and it doesn't look like he'll have much to give in the future. Where's their motivation?

Re: FTX to file for U.S. bankruptcy, CEO resigns

#466

Can anyone speculate what Bankman-Fried's exit plan was? Was this a fraud that got out of control, or premeditated? If it was premeditated, what was the exit plan? Did he expect to be able to gamble with customer funds indefinitely? Were the Effective Altruism intimations genuine? Why, if Alameda was a market maker, and they therefore presumably have some form of insight into the markets, did they then decide to take…

"Theranos just needed a little more time to get the tech working."

Re: FTX to file for U.S. bankruptcy, CEO resigns

#467
post #375

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I also think this is an interesting question. Coming from a lay person I'd imagine it would remain with that name until the contract is up for renewal. Depending on how the naming deal was structured, the money to do the deal would probably have come from FTX' marketing budget in a lump sum up front (presumably) for a fixed number of years. When that's done, the arena will find another source of funds and give the ri…

The administrators / bankruptcy courts will try and do a deal with the stadium. Something like "we can auction the rights again and we will keep 90% of what we get for them, you can have 10%, so you are 10% up, for nothing"

Very unlikely the bankruptcy court will get to do much beyond terminating the deal.

Re: FTX to file for U.S. bankruptcy, CEO resigns

#468

Where were the adults in any of this and why would people throw billions of dollars at unqualified children?

The people of the world have gone that insane.

The people of the world were always this way, and the same thing happened in normal banking until it was regulated.

Re: FTX to file for U.S. bankruptcy, CEO resigns

#469
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He already lost his whole net worth overnight ($16B) and will live in hiding with serious death threats for the rest of his life. This is no ordinary CEO switcheroo where the he walks away with a slap on the wrist and a golden handshake.

I am 100% sure he must have siphoned off some sizable part of his net worth in cash or other non-crypto assets.

SBF personally owns a 7.6% stake in Robinhood worth ~$700m at the current price.

Re: FTX to file for U.S. bankruptcy, CEO resigns

#470
post #448

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Coinbase doesn't offer the leverage that offshore exchanges do. FTX was popular originally because they offered 100x leverage, later reduced to a maximum of 20x. They also had better spreads, probably because they were making their own market and had inside info. I think that people generally didn't expect FTX to be high risk. It's got a profitable business, all they had to do was not embezzle customer funds.

> Coinbase doesn't offer the leverage that offshore exchanges do. FTX was popular originally because they offered 100x leverage Sounds like a red alarm for me. There's probably a good reason domestic exchanges don't let you extend out that far... particularly on extremely volatile securities.

Definitely alarming, but mostly for counterparty risk. If the exchange is just a middle man then they can't lose as long as they're able to liquidate toxic positions before they're negative. Turns out FTX was also the market maker through alameda and because of that was hesitant to liquidate toxic positions, leading to the embezzlement to try to save alameda and the current crisis.
Post reply on HN