Arduino unveils the Opta – “Micro PLC” for industrial IoT
1–10 of 90 posts
Re: Arduino unveils the Opta – “Micro PLC” for industrial IoT
#2I wouldn't want WiFi, Ethernet, or any other IO crashing the Controller. It has to be rock solid.
Re: Arduino unveils the Opta – “Micro PLC” for industrial IoT
#3The Arduino IDE is totally unsuitable for it. No idea what they are doing about this. It would take an amazing amount of work to fix this.
As for PLC functionality people actually use, the product page says "Optional support for standard IEC 61131-3 PLC languages". This is what folks use for real. I presume this means "we didn't want to pay CodeSys but you can". Or something. That sucks.
Maybe they are relying on MBed support as their basic realtime story but, as mentioned, their dev environment is unsuitable for this kind of work.
There is no mention of expected scan time for ladders or guaranteed latency for anything else
So for the intended market, this doesn't look interesting so far. It seems like it will go the way of the x8 and land with a huge thud.
For a random person wanting an Arduino in a cabinet on a din rail, I can see maybe they'd use it.
Re: Arduino unveils the Opta – “Micro PLC” for industrial IoT
#4I looked at the specs, I didn't see a dedicated processor doing the Ladder Logic / Modules part. Perhaps they dedicate one core to it... but that's a lot more janky than a separate CPU at about a dollar or two. I wouldn't want WiFi, Ethernet, or any other IO crashing the Controller. It has to be rock solid.
Re: Arduino unveils the Opta – “Micro PLC” for industrial IoT
#5I do a lot of PLC work. The Arduino IDE is totally unsuitable for it. No idea what they are doing about this. It would take an amazing amount of work to fix this. As for PLC functionality people actually use, the product page says "Optional support for standard IEC 61131-3 PLC languages". This is what folks use for real. I presume this means "we didn't want to pay CodeSys but you can". Or something. That sucks. Maybe…
Re: Arduino unveils the Opta – “Micro PLC” for industrial IoT
#6I do a lot of PLC work. The Arduino IDE is totally unsuitable for it. No idea what they are doing about this. It would take an amazing amount of work to fix this. As for PLC functionality people actually use, the product page says "Optional support for standard IEC 61131-3 PLC languages". This is what folks use for real. I presume this means "we didn't want to pay CodeSys but you can". Or something. That sucks. Maybe…
Re: Arduino unveils the Opta – “Micro PLC” for industrial IoT
#7Oh and we runned a Tensorflow Lite image processing pipeline on that chip. It is probably a few times too powerful for fiddling pins and an IP stack.
Re: Arduino unveils the Opta – “Micro PLC” for industrial IoT
#8I looked at the specs, I didn't see a dedicated processor doing the Ladder Logic / Modules part. Perhaps they dedicate one core to it... but that's a lot more janky than a separate CPU at about a dollar or two. I wouldn't want WiFi, Ethernet, or any other IO crashing the Controller. It has to be rock solid.
Re: Arduino unveils the Opta – “Micro PLC” for industrial IoT
#9I do a lot of PLC work. The Arduino IDE is totally unsuitable for it. No idea what they are doing about this. It would take an amazing amount of work to fix this. As for PLC functionality people actually use, the product page says "Optional support for standard IEC 61131-3 PLC languages". This is what folks use for real. I presume this means "we didn't want to pay CodeSys but you can". Or something. That sucks. Maybe…
To me the most interesting differentiating feature seems to be OTA updates of the firmware really.
Re: Arduino unveils the Opta – “Micro PLC” for industrial IoT
#10Is STM32 still in shortage? I remember it being the largest blocker in one of my projects last year. Especially that high end H7 chip. Oh and we runned a Tensorflow Lite image processing pipeline on that chip. It is probably a few times too powerful for fiddling pins and an IP stack.
Then it'll definitely do the job!