Live data from Hacker News

Survey of workers’ views on salary transparency

resumebuilder.com

21–30 of 281 posts

Re: Survey of workers’ views on salary transparency

#21
post #7

> If they find out their co-workers are making more money to do the same job, they are likely to take action. Here’s the rub: “same job”. Sure, this is a reasonable attitude to take if it’s genuinely the same job and each worker is creating genuinely the same value. But everywhere I’ve worked, comparable jobs are defined as graded job families, and it has been very obvious that there is a diverse range of work being…

Work assignment does not equal ability. A phd can be assigned lowly management work, lets say tracking stuff, creating excel sheets and powerpoint presentations. That decision is made by the company and department. Does that mean they should not be compensated for the skills they posess? Surely not.

Lets not even start with the metrics used to gauge someone's results. If they even exist, they are consistently useless.

Re: Survey of workers’ views on salary transparency

#23
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" [0] [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_each_according_to_his_abi...

Assuming an employer is the proper authority for deciding how much workers "need", and completely ignoring the conflict of interest.

Yeah, that's generally seen as one of the major problems with Marxism.

Re: Survey of workers’ views on salary transparency

#24

I once had employer tell me that because I was single with no kids I did not "need" as much income as a co-worker with multiple kids... I noped out of that employment quickly

I mean this is the same as cost of living adjusted salaries. Same work, less pay just based on geographical location.

Re: Survey of workers’ views on salary transparency

#25

I once had employer tell me that because I was single with no kids I did not "need" as much income as a co-worker with multiple kids... I noped out of that employment quickly

Our managing director had some thoughts of this kind when we all gone remote and travel was no longer required. Needless to say the idea got shot down very quickly,but I'm sure there are plenty of of companies where these things more than float.

Re: Survey of workers’ views on salary transparency

#26
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" [0] [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_each_according_to_his_abi...

Assuming an employer is the proper authority for deciding how much workers "need", and completely ignoring the conflict of interest.

Indeed. Marxism has tended to despotism because it needs the state to have all the power before it can dole out based on what it thinks the need is.

The Politburo often has a lot of need :D

Re: Survey of workers’ views on salary transparency

#28
post #18

I once had employer tell me that because I was single with no kids I did not "need" as much income as a co-worker with multiple kids... I noped out of that employment quickly

This is pretty much how it works in the military, except it's because you are single you don't need to get paid as much as people who are married, but since you're not married you also have plenty of time to stay later and do all the bullshit details. Oh, also if you're an E-5 or below you don't need to have your own home with real amenities like a stovetop. In case you were wondering why there's so much marriage and…

[deleted]

Re: Survey of workers’ views on salary transparency

#29

I once had employer tell me that because I was single with no kids I did not "need" as much income as a co-worker with multiple kids... I noped out of that employment quickly

I mean this is the same as cost of living adjusted salaries. Same work, less pay just based on geographical location.

It's not really based on location. It's based on competition. Location is one of the factors in salary competition.

Re: Survey of workers’ views on salary transparency

#30
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Assuming an employer is the proper authority for deciding how much workers "need", and completely ignoring the conflict of interest.

Yeah, that's generally seen as one of the major problems with Marxism.

The other was, working as little as possible, because you got paid the same, no matter what.

Source: lived in a socialist country

Post reply on HN