Ask HN: If you were in Musk's position, how would you improve Twitter instead?
21–24 of 24 posts
Re: Ask HN: If you were in Musk's position, how would you improve Twitter instead?
#221- authentication by authority: don't give check marks to people, give check marks to organizations, and they can give to their associated humans (employees/members etc), as they fit, and they lose it if they leave the organization. this puts the burden of the verification (and content, by proxy) on the authenticating body, not on the platform. Twitter simply cannot verify all people, but it can verify the much small…
And if Musk doesn’t implement this users could perhaps do it themselves with a browser extension where each user verifies those they interact with and deem notable. Then as you scroll Twitter you can see which accounts have been verified by those you follow. Get a Web of Trust situation going on.
Re: Ask HN: If you were in Musk's position, how would you improve Twitter instead?
#23Bring in new features. Pre-Musk twitter only brought one new feature per year. Reduce bots, spam. Make sure that verified users are not able to change their usernames anyhow they want (currently you will find hundreds of elon musk verified accounts). Improve twitter mobile app (less bloat unlike reddit app) Use crypto payments to pay for twitter blue. Crypto payments meaning not only BTC and Dogecoin but privacy coin…
spam is maybe bad, bots are not categorically bad. I like the idea of an automated feed like Google News which is algorithmically generated to show me news or new things, I dont call it a "bot" in a pejorative way just because its automated. Bots making comments on threads, on the other hand is annoying, but as they get more sophisticated we won't be able to weed this content out. You might say, as a facile take, jus…
There are also good bots on twitter, reddit, telegram, but the context in which we are discussing bots while naturally refer to scam bots along with useless spam bot.