Live data from Hacker News

Musk’s first email to Twitter staff ends remote work

bloomberg.com

231–240 of 1001 posts

Re: Musk’s first email to Twitter staff ends remote work

#231
post #193
post #149

I see we're still deep in the "fuck around" stage and have yet to reach "find out."

What you find out is in proportion to how much you fuck around. You have to fuck around to innovate and do new shit. It took a lot of fucking at Tesla and SpaceX to get to where they are.

Levereged buyouts, charging for features that were free, mass layoffs, strict workplace policies are hardly innovation. They're tried and tested standard boring-ass Jack Welch business practices.

Re: Musk’s first email to Twitter staff ends remote work

#232

According to leaked email on CNBC, Musk said that Twitter needs 50% of its revenue to be subscriptions in order to surivive: > That is why the priority over the past ten days has been to develop and launch Twitter Blue Verified subscriptions (huge props to the team!). Without significant subscription revenue, there is a good chance Twitter will not survive the upcoming economic downturn. We need roughly half of our r…

> According to leaked email on CNBC, Musk said that Twitter needs 50% of its revenue to be subscriptions in order to surivive [...] Is that even remotely feasible?

Yes, Musk can plausibly drive off enough advertisers to get advertising revenue down to parity with subscription revenue.

Don't see how it helps Twitter survive, though.

Re: Musk’s first email to Twitter staff ends remote work

#233
post #190
post #149

I see we're still deep in the "fuck around" stage and have yet to reach "find out."

Quoted post unavailable.

You could do the same with your snarky and unpolite comments. This is not a place for free harassment.

Re: Musk’s first email to Twitter staff ends remote work

#234
post #224

I think that the NYT article has the much better lede from the emails in it: Due to resignations by 3 top execs yesterday, engineers are now likely to have to make sure that their code is compliant with the FTC w.r.t. the 2011 judgement against Twitter. As in, there is a good chance that individual SWEs at Twitter are going to be legally culpable for violations. Even if I am totally misreading that quick lede about d…

[deleted]

[deleted]

Re: Musk’s first email to Twitter staff ends remote work

#235
post #116

Here's a cool and perhaps unforeseen hypothetical turn-of-events: 100% of Twitter's staff give their resignation letter on Friday, and don't show up to work. Leadership wakes up to a collapsing platform, a 44 billion USD bill to pay, with no one to keep the lights on or answer the PagerDuty alerts. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes? No time for silly "knowledge transfers", or "onboarding new team members". You jus…

Friday afternoon: 100% of Twitter's staff are competing with each other to find a new job.

370k software engineer jobs listed on linkedin right now. So each person laid off from these companies gets to choose between 10 open roles at other companies. And that's just what's listed on linkedin; most jobs aren't.

Re: Musk’s first email to Twitter staff ends remote work

#236
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What you find out is in proportion to how much you fuck around. You have to fuck around to innovate and do new shit. It took a lot of fucking at Tesla and SpaceX to get to where they are.

Fuck around and find out.....about Kessler syndrome? (I am being glib, but this is potentially a real problem, see https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/spacexs-starlink-... )

All Starlink sats will deorbit in under 5 years if unmaintained, please get a basic understanding of orbital mechanics before repeating nonsense like this.

Edit: And shame on Scientific American for spreading the same nonsense.

Also Starlink has automated collision avoidance systems that make them even less likely to collide than most sats currently in orbit, see the comments on this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/p7c96z/spacex_starli...

Re: Musk’s first email to Twitter staff ends remote work

#237

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More info about that: https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/10/23451198/twitter-ftc-elo... > The FTC reached a settlement with Twitter in May after the company was caught using personal user info to target ads. If Twitter doesn’t comply with that agreement, the FTC can issue fines reaching into the billions of dollars, according to the lawyer’s note to employees. > The note goes on to say that its author, who The Verge kn…

Quoted post unavailable.

Twitter entered into a voluntary agreement to avoid prosecution.

Re: Musk’s first email to Twitter staff ends remote work

#238

covid is over. it's been over the day we got something else we are supposed to be agitated about. at this point, it feels like a distant memory. nobody cares or pretends to care about it anymore. so why shouldn't we go back to the old normal?

"Why shouldn't we go back" doesn't have any more weight than "why shouldn't we stay". The old normal relies on the acceptance of a lot of life-time wasted and a certain amount of misery, and people were increasingly unwilling to accept it. The pandemic simply provided an impetus - that's all.

Re: Musk’s first email to Twitter staff ends remote work

#239

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More info about that: https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/10/23451198/twitter-ftc-elo... > The FTC reached a settlement with Twitter in May after the company was caught using personal user info to target ads. If Twitter doesn’t comply with that agreement, the FTC can issue fines reaching into the billions of dollars, according to the lawyer’s note to employees. > The note goes on to say that its author, who The Verge kn…

Quoted post unavailable.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a consent decree something that all parties agree to, in order to avoid going to court?

Re: Musk’s first email to Twitter staff ends remote work

#240

Twitter is going down. The question is whether it will take Musk down with it.

He's been embarrassing himself for a minute already but the answer isn't definitely no.

What I realized is he saw contraction in demand at Tesla and wanted a public pretense to sell some without triggering a panic. He had all the Tesla projections long before his tweet about feeling "super bad" about the economy. This deal turned funny money into feeling like a club promoter.

Post reply on HN