Live data from Hacker News

Binance to acquire FTX

bloomberg.com

601–610 of 790 posts

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#601

Why is it apparently so difficult to run a solvent crypto exchange? On the face, it shouldn't be too hard, just take deposits, stick them in a wallet, and swap client balances in a database. Is the temptation to maintain a reserve ratio < 1 just too great? Do operators try to earn small, low-risk return on client funds only to find there are no low-risk, positive-return assets in crypto? Are the extending margin to c…

Faking the liquidity.

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#602
post #541

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My assumption when reading the quote was that it would be an off-market transaction. Similar to how stocks can be traded in Dark Pools outside of the regular stock market.

Their point is that if you have the money to buy $1.1B of something off market, you should also have the money to buy $1.1B of something on market. Any time someone posts an ask at or below $22, you simply fill the order.

beyond the fact that the dynamics of saying "we'll take everything at a certain price up to $1.1B" will likely lead to much more than that showing up on the market and leading to a price crash anyways... I imagine that an off market transaction can involve things like not sending $1.1B in cash to the other person the same day.

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#605
post #598

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FTX should never been in this position. They are an exchange . Nobody should be able to obliterate them by playing around with their crypto.

They are an exchange that allows future trading and margin trading which require borrowing money/assets/coins. The FTT tokens were probably put up as collateral for loans. The drop of the FTT value probably triggers calls on those loans. Thus the liquidity crisis.

that makes FTX a "shadow bank", not merely an exchange.

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#606

Binance was threatening to dump a huge amount of FTT tokens on the market. FTX has a big+vulnerable position in FTT. FTX asked Binance to sell them the tokens for a fixed price, so as not to crash the FTT token price. Binance declined - this was yesterday/today. Of course the price of FTT crashed today. And now Binance buys FTX to help them out... smells like Binance played 4D chess all along. https://decrypt.co/1136…

This is my view as to what possibly happened in last 24 hours. Mind you I have no idea if its real but i am making an educated guess based on my 10+ yrs seeing such events play out several times. 1) Alameda used FTX money and balance sheet along with using $FTT to take out billions of loans and "investments" including possibly customer funds to "invest" "efficiently" into risky investments 2) He then also used a lot…

One missing piece: $1B BTC being auctioned by the IRS soon. This is such a big number that it will almost certainly be bought at a discount by an arbitrageur and liquidated on the market, so this was the impetus for the broad-market crash that killed their leveraged positions.

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#607

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why even reference it then? We have understood that sins of the father are not the sins of the child since at least the book of exodus(~500BC). If that tweeter has done something wrong in his life, then talk about it. But he didn't really have a choice on who birthed him. From the wiki page: > Some of his children were resentful that he gave them no special privileges and treated their mothers poorly.

I went to Georgia Tech with Dare. It's a great school, but it's not exactly the kind of place you send your scions of privilege.

what exactly does Dare do? he always seems to have a take on every little thing in tech. is he a fulltime commentator?

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#608

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> FTX issues FTT tokens (print money) => lends to Alameda to put under the asset balance => Alameda borrows money from outside against its assets or uses the asset/coins to invest in others => win with thin air! The Federal Reserve issues US dollars (print money) => US Treasury borrows money from The Federal Reserve, Japan, China and the UK against its assets or uses the asset/coins to invest in others => win with th…

> The Federal Reserve issues US dollars (print money) => US Treasury borrows money from The Federal Reserve, Japan, China and the UK against its assets or uses the asset/coins to invest in others => win with thin air! Win with the largest military in the world and all tangible assets and influence the US has.

[deleted]

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#609
post #303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just went over the issues on the balance sheet of Alameda Research, which is SBF's trading company. Of the $14.6 billion assets Alameda manages, almost $6 billion is FTT based. Alameda has heavy investment in Solana, Serum, and other alt-coins. It looks like the drop in their value has lowered Alameda's asset balance. Alameda borrowed FTT tokens from FTX to put them as assets in the balance sheet to shore it up. The…

> FTX issues FTT tokens (print money) => lends to Alameda to put under the asset balance => Alameda borrows money from outside against its assets or uses the asset/coins to invest in others => win with thin air! The Federal Reserve issues US dollars (print money) => US Treasury borrows money from The Federal Reserve, Japan, China and the UK against its assets or uses the asset/coins to invest in others => win with th…

This is actually... extremely apt. It is commonly referred to technically as the dollars exhorbitant privilege. It would seem FTX managed to exploit this phenomenon on a micro scale. Until it didn't of course lol

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#610
post #605
post #598

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are an exchange that allows future trading and margin trading which require borrowing money/assets/coins. The FTT tokens were probably put up as collateral for loans. The drop of the FTT value probably triggers calls on those loans. Thus the liquidity crisis.

that makes FTX a "shadow bank", not merely an exchange.

It makes them a brokerage, doesn’t it? Not a shadow bank.
Post reply on HN