Live data from Hacker News

Binance to acquire FTX

bloomberg.com

581–590 of 790 posts

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#581
post #395

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So few people understand this. But, don't worry. Great inventions need some time to be realized.

Can you name off the top of your head 5 great inventions that weren't immediately realized?

Notably, the internet was widely thought to be a fad for the first ~20 years.

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#582

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Binance has serious legal issues (governmental investigations) and isn't based out of any jurisdiction. A Binance failure would have consequences that are very hard to predict

I'm not sure that binance has a reason to exist in the current world where defi is a thing. Things like Coinbase etc are your place to go if you want a fiat to crypto on-ramp or off-ramp or if you want a reasonably safe place to park crypto if you don't want to own it yourself. There are innumerable decentralized exchanges where a person can be absolutely (for some definition of the word) sure that the exchange won't…

And yet, here they are, processing a huge amount of volume. Their customers obviously do think they have a reason for existing.

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#583

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For those not up to date on crypto people, SBF is Sam Bankman-Fried [1] and CZ is Changpeng Zhao [2]. I don't know why they insist on being called by their initials like they're some sort of ticker symbol. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Bankman-Fried [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Changpeng_Zhao

Because they think the people they're most similar to are respected old-school hackers (rms, jwz, etc.) instead of carnival hucksters like P. T. Barnum.

If they were imitating the older style they would use lowercase

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#584
post #395

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So few people understand this. But, don't worry. Great inventions need some time to be realized.

Can you name off the top of your head 5 great inventions that weren't immediately realized?

I’m not saying whatever that is is a great invention but

Alternating current… Computers… Smartphones… The internet…

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#585
post #331
post #280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You may as well say "if everybody jumped off a bridge at the same time...." How many bank runs have there been in 2022 in the developed world? The reason people don't try to pull their money out all at once is because their deposits are insured, because their bank pays into an insurance pool.

The reason people don't try to pull their money out all at once is because their deposits are insured, because their bank pays into an insurance pool. Only up to $250k.

How many people do you think have more than $250k in the bank? How many people do you think have more than $250k in FTX? It sounds like you're saying it's not good enough because 0.1% of people won't get the full benefit.

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#586

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He mentions that they have everyone’s money, and then the very next tweet says “we’ll clear out liquidity crunches”. Literally a contradiction.

It’s not a contradiction. It’s easy to have illiquid funds. For example cold storage or locked funds.

But cold storage and locked funds lead to you taking out a loan or just saying "sorry, it's going to be a while, our funds are locked". You know what you don't do if your funds are illiquid? Sell to your competitor over night.

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#588
post #433

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a terrifying definition of democracy, "you don't get a vote but there is an informal and non-binding channel to lodge complaints." That's not democratic at all!

Democracy can be defined as a popularity contest; democracy does not = good. When I and others say "democratized money", it's not to say it is identical to the definition of democracy as it pertains to a populous voting 1 person 1 vote. More like "money that is not controlled by a single source but rather as large a group as cares to participate who also have access to and knowledge of the tech".

When people say democratized anything, it comes across as meaningless marketing speak. I don't mean the traditional non-political use of the word (i.e., simply making something easily accessible to a lot of people).

It's basically trying to claim some good, without having to quantify or justify that in any way.

The US dollar is ultimately controlled by democratic institutions even if you don't count individuals using it as having any control. Therefore it is democratized money by the same vague handwaving.

Post reply on HN