11–20 of 57 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, he still owns >10% of the company. Accountability when you're a significant owner, not to mention a founder, doesn't just mean that you get fired and sent away from the table.
So what does it mean?
Him saying he's accountable and not actually being held accountable is not really being "accountable".
That is very generous severance. Financially it was worth working for Facebook even when you were hired a year ago.
Him saying he's accountable and not actually being held accountable is not really being "accountable".
He's losing 10s of billions, that seems like a very real way in which he's being held accountable.
Specific info (1st hand knowledge):
Concur has had a suspicious outage today, preventing people from submitting final reimbursement claims. As well as a general hold on purchasing requests (people I suppose trying to get their benefits in).
A mysterious slowdown in meetings with director level leaders, etc. and certain things (project plans, kickoff meetings) being asked to wait for some more information before publishing.
Shitposting forum blowing up with half-joking memes.
Him saying he's accountable and not actually being held accountable is not really being "accountable".
He's losing 10s of billions, that seems like a very real way in which he's being held accountable.
Him saying he's accountable and not actually being held accountable is not really being "accountable".
He's losing 10s of billions, that seems like a very real way in which he's being held accountable.
Him saying he's accountable and not actually being held accountable is not really being "accountable".
He's losing 10s of billions, that seems like a very real way in which he's being held accountable.
If someone who's already got $10m in the bank would happily trade their success for your "consequences", I dunno, just seems... fake. Like playing poker with quarters—sure you "care" but losing doesn't actually hurt in any meaningful way if your total stakes were $10 or whatever.
Him saying he's accountable and not actually being held accountable is not really being "accountable".
Earlier quoted context omitted.
He's losing 10s of billions, that seems like a very real way in which he's being held accountable.
Once you're worth north of a few hundred million dollars, what practical, concrete, difference does a few billion added - or removed - from one's personal wealth make?