Earlier quoted context omitted.
Binance has serious legal issues (governmental investigations) and isn't based out of any jurisdiction. A Binance failure would have consequences that are very hard to predict
If it's going to happen, better sooner than later.
Binance to acquire FTX
211–220 of 790 posts
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
But they're meant to store the customer assets in a cold wallet. They're not meant to invest them in illiquid assets that would need to be liquidated to give people their money. If it's not a contradiction, it's an intentionally misleading statement to avoid admitting they let Alameda Research invest the money when the entities are supposed to be completely separated.
The extremely charitable read is that 1. They have all the funds 2. Many are in cold storage or otherwise inaccessible in short term 3. Their cold storage restore process is so slow they need emergency help to provide liquidity in the meantime Seems more like that they've either embezzled client funds or been hacked/lost some cold storage keys
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#213Binance was threatening to dump a huge amount of FTT tokens on the market. FTX has a big+vulnerable position in FTT. FTX asked Binance to sell them the tokens for a fixed price, so as not to crash the FTT token price. Binance declined - this was yesterday/today. Of course the price of FTT crashed today. And now Binance buys FTX to help them out... smells like Binance played 4D chess all along. https://decrypt.co/1136…
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
12:38 PM · Nov 7, 2022 2) FTX has enough to cover all client holdings. [0] 4:03 PM · Nov 8, 2022 2) Our teams are working on clearing out the withdrawal backlog as is. This will clear out liquidity crunches; all assets will be covered 1:1. This is one of the main reasons we’ve asked Binance to come in. [1] has enough to cover all client holdings ---> not enough to cover all client holding in 24 hours. Either they los…
As other people said, usually a lot of assets are illiquid in 24 hours. You can say I have money to buy this house, but if I ask you for the money the next 24 hours, most people will say they need more time to liquidate. It is actually irresponsible to the users (risk management wise) to be keeping all that cash in hand 24/7. The easiest bad case example: are you keeping all your savings under your mattress? Edit/to…
"We never block withdrawls" is the new "We don't crash ever" as seen in the Facebook movie.
If you are in the crypto exchange business you gotta do both actually. Don't crash the website and don't suspend withdrawls ever.
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#215Wasn't there a post hitting the HN front page just yesterday or two days ago about how FTX was close to being illiquid, and most of the top comments were about how wrong that analysis was? Or was that another crypto trader? If anybody could help my sieve-like brain, that would be very appreciated :-)
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#216Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#217https://techcrunch.com/2022/11/08/binance-signs-letter-of-in...
> Zhao (pictured above) said Binance reached the decision after FTX asked the crypto behemoth for help. “To protect users, we signed a non-binding LOI, intending to fully acquire FTX and help cover the liquidity crunch. We will be conducting a full DD in the coming days,” he said in a tweet.
This appears to be an admission of running a fractional reserve. Otherwise where could a "liquidity crunch" come from.
Hilariously, this is the origin story of Bitcoin. Can't trust banks. Create electronic cash. Users are clueless about what to do with the cryptographic material needed to secure electronic cash. Users park funds at exchange. Exchange operator is a criminal who embezzles the money away, or an incompetent boob who just loses it. Exchange freezes withdrawals, temporarily at first, while continuing to accept deposits. Mayhem ensues. Rinse and repeat.
The entire FTX team belongs behind bars. The VC team that backed this hair-brained venture deserves everything coming to them.
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#218Earlier quoted context omitted.
12:38 PM · Nov 7, 2022 2) FTX has enough to cover all client holdings. [0] 4:03 PM · Nov 8, 2022 2) Our teams are working on clearing out the withdrawal backlog as is. This will clear out liquidity crunches; all assets will be covered 1:1. This is one of the main reasons we’ve asked Binance to come in. [1] has enough to cover all client holdings ---> not enough to cover all client holding in 24 hours. Either they los…
As other people said, usually a lot of assets are illiquid in 24 hours. You can say I have money to buy this house, but if I ask you for the money the next 24 hours, most people will say they need more time to liquidate. It is actually irresponsible to the users (risk management wise) to be keeping all that cash in hand 24/7. The easiest bad case example: are you keeping all your savings under your mattress? Edit/to…
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#219SBF said "We don't invest client assets (even in treasuries)". [0] He then says the purpose of the transaction with Binance is to "clear out the liquidity crunches". [1] How could there be a liquidity crunch if assets are not invested? You can't do a bank run on an entity that doesn't function as a bank and doesn't invest clients assets... Something is shifty. [0] https://twitter.com/sbf_ftx/status/158959828579870720…
You mean the guy who said he named his other co "Alameda Research" so it wouldn't sound like a bank, even though it basically is, might be shifty?
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#220SBF said "We don't invest client assets (even in treasuries)". [0] He then says the purpose of the transaction with Binance is to "clear out the liquidity crunches". [1] How could there be a liquidity crunch if assets are not invested? You can't do a bank run on an entity that doesn't function as a bank and doesn't invest clients assets... Something is shifty. [0] https://twitter.com/sbf_ftx/status/158959828579870720…
This a.m. before securing an emergency lifeline from rival Binance, FTX was canvassing deep pockets in Silicon Valley and Wall St — think billionaires, not institutions — ppl familiar told me & @lmatsakis @SaacksAttack. Two of the ppl he was seeking more than $1bn. https://twitter.com/lizrhoffman/status/1590021299295768578 He / his people didnt call me, but I would have passed anyway