Earlier quoted context omitted.
CTRL+[ also sends ESC control code. So you don't even need to map ESC on tap (I prefer to map layout switching to it).
It's a matter of habit, I guess, but. - Ctrl-[ is a chord that you have to press with 4/5 fingers using both hands at once. - Whereas jk/fd etc are next to each other on the home row and pressed with 2/3 of the same hand sequentially. Given the number of times you would have to exit insert mode, the second option is arguably more ergonomic...
Helix: Post-Modern Text Editor
161–169 of 169 posts
Re: Helix: Post-Modern Text Editor
#162Re: Helix: Post-Modern Text Editor
#163Re: Helix: Post-Modern Text Editor
#164It's a delight to use it, opens in a few milliseconds, has everything I need, you can't and don't need to configure it much. It just works. No distractions.
Re: Helix: Post-Modern Text Editor
#165Am I the only one that doesn't have any strong preference for some editor? I am always super impressed by all the comments stating how much of a night/day difference editors make to them. I have to say that I have tried many (VSC, neovim, Emacs and Spacemacs mostly) in the last five years but at the end of the day I feel like none makes such a difference to me so I just default to whatever my colleagues use to make c…
Do you have strong opinions about what operating system you use? Makes me wonder what the most common area of the stack people's choices are for where their choice is strongly preferred in their computing experience. Also, I imagine that team size and existing diversity of choice plays a role as well.
If choosing I'd go with Mac for work. They have hardware that is reliable, and software that is approachable. Unless it's 3-4 levels deep into MS tech, I'd be confident the Mac can handle it.
If I was starting a new project for myself, like a game or a SaaS thing, then I'd go with some Debian or Arch peppered with a RoFi search/command thing, and a window manager akin to i3. A development machine, entirely geared towards looking at and making of code.
But if time wasn't an issue I would not jump on any of the things available to me. They are all largely misguided with relation to my goals. None of them are particularly enabling. All of them are better than center-aligned Comic Sans in a Word.app document, but none of them integrate my prior knowledge, or even the projects I previously did. Every new project is entirely new anyways.
Computers kinda went the sellout route circa 2012, the PC makers do what they understand will sell well, and there aren't any projects that are different enough to warrant an interest. The commercial offering is geared towards the common journeyman programmer, in it's entirety. There are no niche computing devices, I'd expect to see thousands of those, but still there are a handful at best.
There is like one model of a 3-year old Thinkpad that I'd buy, but it doesn't get me excited enough to actually do that. I'd put some Linux on it, with flare.
I have strong opinions. I have the 20+ years of experience to have formed them.
If I were to take a job or a gig in coding ever again, I'd ask the employer for a machine and figure it out from there. I don't care what it is. As my employer, you make these decisions and suffer their consequences.
I'm just here to figure it out, clock out and go home, where you will never, ever call or message me. You got your 8 hours, and they are as you made them come out. Get screwed.
Re: Helix: Post-Modern Text Editor
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looks interesting. I've always remapped capslock to CTRL myself, of course, but haven't thought of remapping tap-capslock to ESC. It looks like you need external software to do this though (like Karabiner Elements on mac, or xcape on linux, etc). (That being said, if you're used to jk/kj/fd/jj/jf, many years of muscle memory would still take a while to erase...)
Actually, MacOS can do this out of the box with no extra software installed. It's in the keyboard settings
In Mac? Never.
Shame tho...
Re: Helix: Post-Modern Text Editor
#167It's interesting to me, reading comments in this thread, that this editor mostly seems to appeal to current vim/emacs users. It's like the first choice everyone makes when selecting an editor is deciding whether they want something that runs in the terminal, something that calls itself as an "IDE", or something in between. Am I the only one who cares a lot more about functionality than branding or user interface? The…
but in reality there are less then a hundred alltogether for all time
each is a project of passion, and all are resultant in a peculiar, particular and special kind of thing to do a special kind of thing
you can't select a thing the VIM way and then do something to it the Emacs way
you can't eat Catholic while working Maori
or you can, but then it is just another special thing that you made up
text isn't a thing
code is a thing (many ways, depending on the approach), prose is a thing (many ways), poetry is a thing, legal writing is a thing
text is not a problem that can be solutioned, it is not a question that has an answer
Re: Helix: Post-Modern Text Editor
#168Re: Helix: Post-Modern Text Editor
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
See https://xkcd.com/1172/
I know the xkcd, I just don't understand your point.