PowerPoint has a feature where it uses machine learning to suggest layout and design changes for your content. This feature most likely can be turned off, but of course it needs some data on what's on your slide to suggest changes. I hope this submission is flagged and removed. Just because you don't like Microsoft doesn't mean such misrepresentation is okay.
I don't think we know the motivation of the submitter and we should not assume any motivation beyond introducing the link to the community to consider and discuss the content.
The article is very brief and seems to highlight that the designer suggestion needs to submit your slide content to make the suggestion. The question as to whether we consented suggests that we have (through the usual click through), but, to me, it is really asking something like 'do we understand the implications of our decision to consent?'.
I don't see anything being misrepresented nor do I infer there is some sort of anti-Microsoft (nor anti-anyone/anything) in the article. It does seem to suggest there is something for people to consider in that we often 'consent' without really thinking through the outcomes of what is supposed to be our willing, informed consent.
Too often we split into binary extremes when we should really take time to be thoughtful and considerate of questions being posed and where that consideration takes us and helps us to find insights and opportunities to improve ourselves. I encourage people to not automatically jump to our 'team position' (whatever that is).