Live data from Hacker News

Barilla passive cooker

barilla.com

41–50 of 528 posts

Re: Barilla passive cooker

#41
post #3

> When the water boils, pour in your pasta. Why even wait for the water to boil? I always pour my pasta into the cold water right from the start, and it doesn't seem to make any difference.

this might work for you barbarians, but for us italians this a big no-no ;)

Re: Barilla passive cooker

#42
post #24

You can reduce the energy consumption drastically by boiling way less water than "a large pot" as every packet recommends. Just enough to cover the pasta + some evaporation margin is good enough.

That's why I tend to avoid spaghetti these days. A smaller pasta fits in the small pot better.

just rip it in half

(runs!)

Re: Barilla passive cooker

#43
The most reduction in CO2 could be achieved if all the people that regularly overcook the pasta would just take it out after the amount of time written on the package. (only partially /s :-) )

Re: Barilla passive cooker

#44

My dirty little secret I've only dared to shared with my closest friends (fearing social ostracism) is that I cook by pasta by putting it in cold water and then turn the heat on. Roughly when the water starts to boil I start periodically checking the doneness of the pasta. Works just fine for me. Would never dare to it when cooking with friends however (only slightly /s). However, it would be neat with a device simil…

I see this in lots of 'how to boil an egg' guides, where cooking time matters. When explaining it on the internet, the best way is to dump the egg into boiling water, and drain and cool with cold tap water after X minutes, because it removes other variables. Buuuuut, if you learn your pot and water volumes and starting water temperatures and heating rate, you can cook your egg faster by starting with cold water, and…

For eggs I've seen people use something like this [0], which I guess can be helpful if you switch pots a lot. Also trickier to test if a (boiled) egg really is boiled then with pasta.

[0]: https://www.amazon.com/Norpro-Egg-Perfect-Timer/dp/B00004UE7...

Re: Barilla passive cooker

#45
post #20

According to Kenji, you don't even need boiling water to cook pasta: https://www.seriouseats.com/how-to-cook-pasta-salt-water-boi... https://www.seriouseats.com/tips-for-better-easier-pasta "Want to get even more crazy efficient? Try soaking pasta in water as your prep your other ingredients. By the time your sauce is ready, you can just add the pasta (along with some of its soaking liquid) to the pan and, with a min…

Harold McGee himself (author of the food geek bible On Food and Cooking) also presented this idea back in 2011: https://www.splendidtable.org/story/2011/01/15/you-can-cook-...

> I just did the experiment of cooking a pound of pasta in just enough water for it to absorb. I thought, "While I'm at it, why don't I play with the heating as well? I'll start them in cold water and see what happens."

> I found that starting in cold water means that the pasta doesn't stick to itself, which is great. Then it turns out that it heats up, it cooks just fine and you end up with pasta that is not at all sticky. The liquid is a little thick, but that's wonderful because you can make a sauce out of it.

Re: Barilla passive cooker

#47
post #20

According to Kenji, you don't even need boiling water to cook pasta: https://www.seriouseats.com/how-to-cook-pasta-salt-water-boi... https://www.seriouseats.com/tips-for-better-easier-pasta "Want to get even more crazy efficient? Try soaking pasta in water as your prep your other ingredients. By the time your sauce is ready, you can just add the pasta (along with some of its soaking liquid) to the pan and, with a min…

I always wondered if you could just put spaghetti in your Nalgene while backpacking and it would be ready by the end of your hike. People always look at me weird when I suggest it but I am down to drink starchy water all day and then eat spaghetti when I get there haha.

Re: Barilla passive cooker

#48

Interesting there are so many different names for these types of cookers. I've always heard this referred to as a haybox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haybox

Huh I have a thermal cooker at home that we frequently use: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_cooking

Seems like they are using the same concept.

Re: Barilla passive cooker

#49
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Different stoves take different amount of time to boil water. Kinda hard to follow the timing directions on the box if you start with cold water.

Hint: There is a direct way to tell if pasta is almost done.

Oooh, maybe we can build a $400 IoT device that requires a $60/month subscription around this idea?

Oh... just tasting a piece of pasta? Never mind.

Re: Barilla passive cooker

#50
post #4

Not really "passive" cooking as you're just not actively pumping heat into already boiling water and just cooking pasta in steadily cooling water. You can actually soften pasta and many other similar foods by just leaving them in room temperature water for a much longer period. Some backpackers do this to reduce weight and it's been the only way I've ever prepared food while backpacking. Admittedly, cold noodles, oat…

Wait, how long would you soak rice to make it edible? I’d imagine it’s longer than 24 hours.

It will get moldy before it ever gets cooked. Learn from my fail.
Post reply on HN