Live data from Hacker News

Mastodon's founder has a vision to democratize social media

time.com

121–130 of 289 posts

Re: Mastodon's founder has a vision to democratize social media

#121
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Handling it less like email and more like a “well if it blows up ah well” is part of the featureset in my opinion.

Social accounts are monetizable & part of peoples brands now - “well if it blows up ah well” might be fine for you or for me, but might not be for others.

Then don't use free instances? There's a bunch of companies that would run a dedicated instance for you for a couple dozen $/mo.

Re: Mastodon's founder has a vision to democratize social media

#122
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's the community of academics? I haven't joined Twitter specifically because I think it's a horrible medium for communicating science or meeting with academics. Can you point me there?

Just from a quick look, no claim to completeness, intentionally including also small ones: https://fediscience.org/ https://vis.social/ https://mstdn.science/ https://astrodon.social/ https://mapstodon.space/ currently not taking signups: https://scholar.social/ https://scicomm.xyz/

https://econtwitter.net

Re: Mastodon's founder has a vision to democratize social media

#123

Is there any space nowadays for tech that is essentially free of politicized rhetoric? I really don't care about democracy or decentralization on my social media platform. When I first discovered Tumblr, MySpace, LiveJournal, Xanga, AIM, and Twitter I didn't care about any of their techno-political underpinnings.

Some servers enforce a rule where political messages are hidden behind a content warning. Check the CoC before you sign up.

Re: Mastodon's founder has a vision to democratize social media

#124

I really want to like Mastodon, and every few years I make an attempt to join. But then, I am faced with the decision of choosing a server - if I like cooking and golf, do I join the cooking server or the golf server? What if I choose wrong ? - and the choice overload makes me just give up. And even if I really joined, then apparently my server's administrator would be able to silently prevent me from seeing other "e…

Also, besides choosing a server, how do you figure out which other servers that server "federates" with or blocks entirely?

Re: Mastodon's founder has a vision to democratize social media

#126

Predictions: Mastodon becomes platform for technically minded center left. Tribel Social becomes lower brow left version of Parler. Twitter loses customers to aforementioned platforms but survives.

Prediction: masses get into Mastodon, governments mandate protocol tapping to filter out some ActivityPub traffic, for "kids good" or to "stop terrorism". Hosting companies and ISPs start to disallow hosting social networks in their T&C, kind like torrent or crypto mining.

Re: Mastodon's founder has a vision to democratize social media

#127
post #107

I really want to like Mastodon, and every few years I make an attempt to join. But then, I am faced with the decision of choosing a server - if I like cooking and golf, do I join the cooking server or the golf server? What if I choose wrong ? - and the choice overload makes me just give up. And even if I really joined, then apparently my server's administrator would be able to silently prevent me from seeing other "e…

Two big, vanilla instances are https://mastodon.social and https://mas.to . Unfortunately they've both been struggling to keep up with demand lately. If you're paralyzed by choice, I'd say just go for one of those if / when they're accepting new users. I think Mastodon would get more signups if interested people were just pointed at like ten working, non-specialized, non-tiny instances, rather than being confronted w…

They're wasting a massive opportunity. Mastodon should have been built to scale from the start because huge viral growth is exactly how social networks like this make it big.

As it stands right now, I am struggling to join because every mastodon instance I've checked is struggling with scaling.

Re: Mastodon's founder has a vision to democratize social media

#128
post #107

I really want to like Mastodon, and every few years I make an attempt to join. But then, I am faced with the decision of choosing a server - if I like cooking and golf, do I join the cooking server or the golf server? What if I choose wrong ? - and the choice overload makes me just give up. And even if I really joined, then apparently my server's administrator would be able to silently prevent me from seeing other "e…

Two big, vanilla instances are https://mastodon.social and https://mas.to . Unfortunately they've both been struggling to keep up with demand lately. If you're paralyzed by choice, I'd say just go for one of those if / when they're accepting new users. I think Mastodon would get more signups if interested people were just pointed at like ten working, non-specialized, non-tiny instances, rather than being confronted w…

In the category of large general instances, there's also https://mstdn.social and https://mastodon.online.

Re: Mastodon's founder has a vision to democratize social media

#129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The thing is, Mastodon isn't adding censorship: Anyone has numerous servers to choose from that will let them say whatever they want, but other people have the choice to go to servers which don't federate with the other one. Free speech is the right to speak, not the right to force everyone to listen. The federation model codifies this.

>Anyone has numerous servers to choose from that will let them say whatever they want, but other people have the choice to go to servers which don't federate with the other one. And then people who are unhappy with the mere existence of other servers hosting speech they dislike will launch coordinated attacks on the upstream infrastructure and revenue streams of those servers, as we've seen time and time and time aga…

That’s a strange take. If another server hosts content I, as a Mastodon admin, dislike, then I can simply choose not to talk to them. I do not owe them a platform. I’m not preventing my users from creating a second account on that server so that they can interact with it. That server has perfect freedom to host whatever they see fit, and I have perfect freedom not to see it.

And if I’m too quick to block servers, my users will leave for less restrictive alternatives. Same if I’m too slow to block bad actors: people being harassed by users on those servers will leave for somewhere more moderated. In short, there’s a feedback loop that tends to optimize a community’s moderation to follow that community’s preferences. What more could you possibly ask for?

Re: Mastodon's founder has a vision to democratize social media

#130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember complaining the “iPad” sounded like a menstrual product. Seemed to do fine.

The i-line of products was already well known by the general public at the time to be synonymous with Apple. iTunes, iPod, iPhone ... those were normal english words prefixed with an "i". People wonder why Apple didn't call their watch the iWatch. This is a much different thing with "mastrodon". It's not a word people are familiar with, has enough syllables to sound funny, and gets combined with other nonsense words…

I think you're skipping past the word "pad" which is what people thought was weird, not the I.

Toot is as much a basic word as tweet, I think you are just reflecting your own bias towards words from products you already know.

Post reply on HN