Live data from Hacker News

TextMate 2 (Public) Alpha

blog.macromates.com

101–110 of 178 posts

Re: TextMate 2 (Public) Alpha

#101
The thing that has kept me with Textmate has been its particular style of autocompletion, and a few bundles that I really love, namely the jQuery bundle, Javascript Tools, and the CodeIgniter bundle.

I use it nearly every day, so it's hard to adjust to anything else.

Re: TextMate 2 (Public) Alpha

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm sure I'm not the only textmate user who finds Sublime Text hideous. I'd sooner bite the bullet on vim if I'm going the ugly route.

I would have to agree. I tried Sublime Text for two weeks, but I continued to dislike it. It's not a bad editor or anything, it's just not for me. Personally I'm getting a bit tired of reading about how people think that TextMate is done and how we should move on. TextMate 1.5 is still my text editor of choice, it simply fit how I work. Honestly I would be happy if TextMate 1.5 is just maintained as is. There's a lot…

Nah, Textmate 1.5 as it is is perfectly fine. I mean, who really needs chunked undo anyway? And opening files larger than a few hundred k? Really, just split them. They"re a bad idea anyways. Or something like incremental regex search. Real men can read the code faster than any search indexer, so who needs that?

Seriously though, I agree that some incremental fixes to Textmate 1.5 might have been a saner option than a full rewrite. I for one did not wait and moved on in the meantime.

Re: TextMate 2 (Public) Alpha

#104
post #7

A lot of people I know switched from TextMate to vim because of the lengthy delay. After using vim for a couple of years now, it would be very hard to go back to TextMate.

Yeah, but far more people will never learn vim because of the learning curve.

I suspect that people who actually try Vim are perfectly likely to learn and like it. People who are scared away by comments like yours, on the other hand...

Re: TextMate 2 (Public) Alpha

#105
post #100
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is one feature in TextMate that's not in Sublime which I really love to the point, where it's an absolute requirement for me: when I edit a file in TextMate and my account lacks permission for saving the file, TM would allow me to sudo right from the GUI in order to still save. This is much better than seeing that I can't save, copy the whole file to the clipboard, reopen it with 'sudo vim' and then pasting it…

Would something like this work for you? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/95072/what-are-your-favor...

No blow should pass, without two blows returned:

* http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/SudoSave

* http://stackoverflow.com/questions/95631/open-a-file-with-su...

(I jest. Vim is an awesome editor and I recommend it to all my friends using Eclipse, Visual Studio, and XCode. But true enlightenment lies in Emacs, where vim is only another mode called evil: http://emacswiki.org/emacs/Evil)

Re: TextMate 2 (Public) Alpha

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's not much to see, it's an editor, but here you go: http://i.imgur.com/ZyIP5.png Blackboard theme and the font is DejaVu Sans Mono... I think TextMate 2 just uses the font I set in version 1.

Off-topic: I see in your screenshots that Dock icons of applications that are not started are on their side. How did you do this?

Short answer: I didn't. The sleeping dog is an Adium icon, ask them how it works. I assume that the other icon is the "Fr" icon. That's Flush.app that flushes Flash cookies. The icons just looks like that, it never changes. Sorry to disappoint.

But based on Adium, I assume that Mac OS X somehow allows you to change icons when the application starts. I would assume that it's something that the application need to handle.

Re: TextMate 2 (Public) Alpha

#107

> Full screen mode: This is mainly because we are hesitant to go Lion-only so we are holding back with “lionizing” TextMate till we feel confident we can fully drop backwards compatibility. That's not true. Adding full-screen support does not require breaking backwards compatibility: it's a quick check to see if the feature can be enabled.

I don't really understand why the application has to support full screen mode. Isn't that something the window manager should really be doing?

Re: TextMate 2 (Public) Alpha

#108

> Full screen mode: This is mainly because we are hesitant to go Lion-only so we are holding back with “lionizing” TextMate till we feel confident we can fully drop backwards compatibility. That's not true. Adding full-screen support does not require breaking backwards compatibility: it's a quick check to see if the feature can be enabled.

"we are holding back"

so you mean there's more than 1 person sitting doing nothing for over 2 years?

Re: TextMate 2 (Public) Alpha

#109

> Full screen mode: This is mainly because we are hesitant to go Lion-only so we are holding back with “lionizing” TextMate till we feel confident we can fully drop backwards compatibility. That's not true. Adding full-screen support does not require breaking backwards compatibility: it's a quick check to see if the feature can be enabled.

I don't really understand why the application has to support full screen mode. Isn't that something the window manager should really be doing?

It's opt-in for old projects, but it's as simple as compiling the app with Lion support without code changes or compatibility issues to turn on the flag for the window in IB. (Obviously, for new Lion projects, it's automatically enabled). The issue of checking in code comes when you want to add an "Enter Fullscreen" menu item, which requires a tiny bit of code to make sure you don't call "toggleFullscreen:" on a window that doesn't know about it (or display the menu item on an OS where it will do nothing).

Still. It's pretty basic.

(As for the window manager supporting it, some apps really shouldn't be fullscreen - Address Book, I'm looking at you - so having an easy opt-in/out mechanism seems pretty necessary on the application side.)

Re: TextMate 2 (Public) Alpha

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but far more people will never learn vim because of the learning curve.

I suspect that people who actually try Vim are perfectly likely to learn and like it. People who are scared away by comments like yours, on the other hand...

It took me several false starts over the course of a few years to finally take the plunge.
Post reply on HN