Live data from Hacker News

Portmaster 1.0 – Open-Source Network Monitor and Privacy Firewall

safing.io

51–60 of 117 posts

Re: Portmaster 1.0 – Open-Source Network Monitor and Privacy Firewall

#51
What's the performance impact on this, especially on windows?

Also what would happen if I installed a Windows gateway, using routing and remote access services, and then installed portmaster on that?

Overall this looks pretty awesome, and I'm excited to try it out.

Oh and can I use this in conjunction with wire guard? How does it play with other vpns.

Re: Portmaster 1.0 – Open-Source Network Monitor and Privacy Firewall

#52

I'd really like to see more technical discussion of Safing's SPN idea and implementation ( https://safing.io/spn/ ). If I've understood it correctly, it seems to be in-line with the general trajectory of where Cloudflare is going with DNS privacy and Apple is going with its relay service. It seems obvious that VPN services should be split into Relay and Exit services so that you don't have to necessarily trust a sing…

It doesn't even define the acronym!

Re: Portmaster 1.0 – Open-Source Network Monitor and Privacy Firewall

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pretty much, yes.

I guess having it combined can have portability/mobility benefits but other than that I doubt if the performance benefits of OpenSnitch (or) ability to secure entire network through PiHole is worth replacing.

You won't be wrong about that, but I like to think of PortMaster as more of an open-source Glasswire replacement that can also run on Linux. It is an impressive piece of software nevertheless.

Re: Portmaster 1.0 – Open-Source Network Monitor and Privacy Firewall

#54
post #51

What's the performance impact on this, especially on windows? Also what would happen if I installed a Windows gateway, using routing and remote access services, and then installed portmaster on that? Overall this looks pretty awesome, and I'm excited to try it out. Oh and can I use this in conjunction with wire guard? How does it play with other vpns.

Q: What's the performance impact on this, especially on windows?

Basically negligible. Secure DNS might be a bit slower and you might feel some impact on low end devices.

Q: Also what would happen if I installed a Windows gateway, using routing and remote access services, and then installed portmaster on that?

You'd probably be cut off as incoming connections are blocked by default. Please place a config with exceptions before install or have (virtual) physical access when installing.

Q: Oh and can I use this in conjunction with wire guard? How does it play with other vpns.

We have a whole page on that in the docs: https://docs.safing.io/portmaster/install/status/vpn-compati...

Re: Portmaster 1.0 – Open-Source Network Monitor and Privacy Firewall

#55
post #52

I'd really like to see more technical discussion of Safing's SPN idea and implementation ( https://safing.io/spn/ ). If I've understood it correctly, it seems to be in-line with the general trajectory of where Cloudflare is going with DNS privacy and Apple is going with its relay service. It seems obvious that VPN services should be split into Relay and Exit services so that you don't have to necessarily trust a sing…

It doesn't even define the acronym!

Sorry about that. It's "Safing Privacy Network".

Re: Portmaster 1.0 – Open-Source Network Monitor and Privacy Firewall

#56

I'd really like to see more technical discussion of Safing's SPN idea and implementation ( https://safing.io/spn/ ). If I've understood it correctly, it seems to be in-line with the general trajectory of where Cloudflare is going with DNS privacy and Apple is going with its relay service. It seems obvious that VPN services should be split into Relay and Exit services so that you don't have to necessarily trust a sing…

The SPN (Safing Privacy Network) aims to fill the area between VPNs and Tor. VPNs provide very little real privacy and Tor is (outside Tor Browser) very difficult to setup and configure.

Yes, you are correct, there are similarities there. Except of course that SPN is open source.

We do have a white paper: https://safing.io/files/whitepaper/Gate17.pdf

And YES! I'd love to see more technical discussion of the SPN too. So many things to unpack, to learn and improve.

Re: Portmaster 1.0 – Open-Source Network Monitor and Privacy Firewall

#58
> Please note that pretty much all the DNS leak detection tests by the VPN providers will be a false positive, as the only thing they check is if you are using their DNS servers. Rest assured that your DNS queries are well protected by the Portmaster and there is no need to be concerned." [1]

That's a confusing statement... does this mean they change your DNS server/provider by default, if you are using a VPN?

[1] https://docs.safing.io/portmaster/install/status/vpn-compati...

Re: Portmaster 1.0 – Open-Source Network Monitor and Privacy Firewall

#59
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For macOS I can strongly recommend Little Snitch. It's not open source, but I like that it's not subscription software and doesn't collect personal data. https://www.obdev.at/products/littlesnitch/index.html

I've been running LuLu and it works great. https://objective-see.org/products/lulu.html

FYI: It comes with opt-out Sentry crash reporting.

Edit: Shipping such a component enabled by default might be unexpected for applications of this nature and easily overlooked, which is why I mention it.

Re: Portmaster 1.0 – Open-Source Network Monitor and Privacy Firewall

#60
Definitely one of the best firewalls for normal people on Linux. (g)UFW is nice and easy but very basic. Portmaster is a lot closer to the firewalls you may find for Windows that list applications and their statistics/configuration.

My only problem with it is that under heavy load the DoH server dies or gets stuck at 50% CPU for me. It also hangs my custom DoT/DoH solution for some reason but that's not a Portmaster problem.

Post reply on HN