The fake consternation and lament over Twitter has been tiring. Really, most of the world does not care.
It looks like I’m moving to Mastodon
181–190 of 472 posts
Re: It looks like I’m moving to Mastodon
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
To not support it's new owner
We know many things about Musk because he's a well known public figure which has attracted the attention of plenty of investigative journalists. But what do you know about the owners of the Mastodon instance you registered your account with? Are they accountable? Are they sensible? Are they competent? Do they even have a real identity?
Re: It looks like I’m moving to Mastodon
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
> HN-tyke Not sure if on purpose or just serendipitous misspell. I use whatsapp because my clients use whatsapp. Which means the team uses whatsapp. Friends are spread on several apps.
My bad, fixed. Have you tried a WhatsApp-bridge with element/matrix? You could use matrix internally while being available to clients via WA. I would strongly discourage any company to use meta-clients internally.
If we have extra time we spend it on checking backups, or improving performance, or researching new cool stuff we can add to our product. Which messenger app to use?! Yeah, definitely culture shock. Severe, too.
Re: It looks like I’m moving to Mastodon
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
"I was happy to do free work for that billionaire, he's part of the same ideology I've been born into. But now that it's this other billionaire, I cannot continue."
I don't see a problem with this, except being born into an ideology. Most people these days have chosen one and cultivated it according to their life. I think my ideology is good, if it wasn't I would change it to be the good version. So why would I not work with someone who shares mine? Billionaire or not.
Alternatively, it seems to have a significant genetic component, and most of the rest will depend on the environment you grow up in. Choice isn't part of it, you don't evaluate all the possibilities and then pick the best one, you think the one you're part of is the best one because it intuitively made sense to you. The rest is rationalization.
Re: It looks like I’m moving to Mastodon
#185Quoted post unavailable.
Exactly. They will announce that they are 'leaving' but don't have the guts to delete their Twitter accounts and their followers as they will continue to lurk and post links from Twitter on wherever they moved to.
Re: It looks like I’m moving to Mastodon
#186I find this hilarious. We all understand that the core reason some people might want to hurt twitter is because it is no longer going to follow the moderation policy that they liked (namely, silencing people with different political opinions). Yet, people can't name this reason honestly, and invent some other thin weiled excuses like 'layoffs are baaaad and unethical'. Bold prediction: this influencer with 40k follow…
Re: It looks like I’m moving to Mastodon
#187And I'm finally going to try Twitter!
Re: It looks like I’m moving to Mastodon
#188I find this hilarious. We all understand that the core reason some people might want to hurt twitter is because it is no longer going to follow the moderation policy that they liked (namely, silencing people with different political opinions). Yet, people can't name this reason honestly, and invent some other thin weiled excuses like 'layoffs are baaaad and unethical'. Bold prediction: this influencer with 40k follow…
If I doubt the future of a platform and already find the status quo questionable, I am just not as motivated to put in the time to do something on there.
I guess for many people twitter was a platform they wanted to get rid of for a while, this is just a trigger to convince the others as well.
Re: It looks like I’m moving to Mastodon
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is absolutely not what they said, and you are being disingenuous by pretending that it is.
The point being made that Twitter was owned by rich people before Elon bought it.
Re: It looks like I’m moving to Mastodon
#190Unfortunately I have to say that I’m too removed from this to care (I guess decisions like this happen invisibly in every company all the time). However, the true intentions about this acquisition do make me curious. Does he really think that patting the backs of a handful of conservative extremists will make Twitter better? (An already global leader in its segment?) can anyone give me a concrete analysis of the scen…
it's like the more modern version of buying a vanity newspaper and looks to be following the same pattern