Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The question for you is whether the government has a need or the right to know every penny (or whatever fractional currency you can legally use) that you move around. First, there is nothing like the government in Europe. Secondly, the organisms that are tracking as extensively as possible European citizen are mostly private firms (whose parent companies are typically not European). European directives like GPDR ar…
> First, there is nothing like the government in Europe. technically no... but in practice, yes. EU decides something, and local governments must implement the EU-wide changes into local laws. If EU decides to do something, they do it... the states are not as sovereign as it might seem. I mean... look at EU banning RT (dot com) - https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022... EU decided to identify p…
The thing is, "EU decides" hides all the complexity of the reality. First of all, "Europe Union" can refer to many things. Here, most likely the sentence refers to the European Parliament. European Commission, European Council, euro area are three other distinct notions for example that can be easily confused with EU.
>the states are not as sovereign as it might seem.
They prioritize their sovereign decision power on staying unified above local punctual interests… or not, as the Brexit showed. States, so far, remain sovereign, even if they accept to bow before collegial decisions in which they themselves participate.
European Council is the institution that is generally presented as "the government".