Honestly, what? Every job I have had in IT/programming/universities/heavy industry have been "at will". We can fire you at any time for any reason. Is silicon valley not like this? What is this "advanced notice"?? No, really, I am not taking sides, but is this how it works at some places? I have been working for several decades, I have _never_ heard of this.
California has 60 days. Most European countries have more
Twitter faces a class action lawsuit over mass employee layoffs with proper
181–190 of 295 posts
Re: Twitter faces a class action lawsuit over mass employee layoffs with proper
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would imagine needing the paycheck. Those who were put on garden leave have 3 months of pay to lean on while they search. Those who were not, if they quit, their pay ends that day. They'd have whatever savings they have.
You both seem to assume everyone wants to leave. Which is probably not the case.
Re: Twitter faces a class action lawsuit over mass employee layoffs with proper
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is an interesting case. In France, the case was already judged and having your means of work (example: access to your professional email) cut off before the end of your contract (which include the required advance notice) is considered unlawful firing. The same goes if you are put in the "placard doré", meaning you are not given any work to do. Of course, the laws in France favor the worker a lot more than the U.S…
I mean in France, "at will" employment is illegal at first place.
Re: Twitter faces a class action lawsuit over mass employee layoffs with proper
#184Honestly, what? Every job I have had in IT/programming/universities/heavy industry have been "at will". We can fire you at any time for any reason. Is silicon valley not like this? What is this "advanced notice"?? No, really, I am not taking sides, but is this how it works at some places? I have been working for several decades, I have _never_ heard of this.
Re: Twitter faces a class action lawsuit over mass employee layoffs with proper
#185Honestly, what? Every job I have had in IT/programming/universities/heavy industry have been "at will". We can fire you at any time for any reason. Is silicon valley not like this? What is this "advanced notice"?? No, really, I am not taking sides, but is this how it works at some places? I have been working for several decades, I have _never_ heard of this.
California has 60 days. Most European countries have more
Re: Twitter faces a class action lawsuit over mass employee layoffs with proper
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
California is at-will. And it still requires 60 days notice for a mass-layoff, thorough a separate act, because it's a special case that's covered by a separate law. > “an employer may not order a mass layoff, relocation, or termination at a covered establishment unless, 60 days before the order takes effect, the employer gives written notice of the order” https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/Cal-WARNAct.html
Without sounding dumb, this is saying that a company has to tell you 60 days ahead of time that in 60 days they will fire you? edit: Thank you for the clarification, appreciate the added insights.
Only applies in the case of mass layoffs.
Re: Twitter faces a class action lawsuit over mass employee layoffs with proper
#187> Additional plaintiffs, Justine De Caires, Jessica Pan, and Grae Kindel said they were terminated on November 3 by being locked out of their accounts. > Under Twitter’s takeover deal terms, Musk had agreed to keep employee compensation and benefits the same. That means the laid-off employees should receive 60 days of salary and the cash value of the stock they were to receive within three months of their last date a…
Re: Twitter faces a class action lawsuit over mass employee layoffs with proper
#188> Additional plaintiffs, Justine De Caires, Jessica Pan, and Grae Kindel said they were terminated on November 3 by being locked out of their accounts. > Under Twitter’s takeover deal terms, Musk had agreed to keep employee compensation and benefits the same. That means the laid-off employees should receive 60 days of salary and the cash value of the stock they were to receive within three months of their last date a…
This is exactly it. Terminated technically means, no longer receiving compensation or benefits. If Musk is basically saying “stop working” and we will pay you for the next 60 days (and even beyond), then this is completely legal as long as they are not restricted from seeking other employment during this “notice period” Edit: IANAL
Re: Twitter faces a class action lawsuit over mass employee layoffs with proper
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
pb7 is probably correct here, as they are in many things. Elon probably knows what he's doing, you don't get to that level of businessmen without making all the right decisions.
That is a dangerous Calvinist line of thinking. If someone lies/steals/cheats their way to the top, you’d never notice because you are ascribing virtue to the person solely by their success
Re: Twitter faces a class action lawsuit over mass employee layoffs with proper
#190All of my layoffs had post termination pay to satisfy federal and state law. HR stressed that we were on salary (without working) during the termination period and that leaving would negate benefits. Once this period ended, there were usual benefits like n weeks per year of employment. Blatantly ignoring the rules just invites lawsuits and weakens em’s position. Sux how rules and established norms of behaviour restri…
Just curious which state was that where they had to give severance? I'm in a US state that does not require anything after termination.