Practically speaking the engagement-centric approach this post appears to advocate for is likely to fail in the long run, if the goal is to build something lasting and not just a short-term experiment. For example, one of the more successful and lasting computing tutorial Youtubers is TheCherno, basically focusing on C++ and game engines and graphics. Clearly, a lot of effort goes into each post, and even though they're perhaps not as frequent, over time they do very well:
I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened
31–40 of 156 posts
Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened
#32Thanks for the great post! I'm curious - roughly how much income does this level of engagement generate on YouTube?
> As you can see I am not there yet by a long shot!
Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened
#33Anyone have any recommendations for such a setup?
Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened
#34Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
The sad state of headlines and video titles. Even Veritasium, an otherwise reputable channel, has jumped this shark.
They explained in a video why they do it… Most creators are explicit in why they do it. If they didn’t - their channel wouldn’t reach as far as it did otherwise.
But I hate it. The change is a tangible downgrade that cheapens the channels who do it. I'm glad for them that they have a larger reach, but I'm no longer a part of that reach because I can't stomach the chintzy thumbnails and titles designed to appeal to first-graders. I voted with my feet on that change.
Maybe that's just me.
Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened
#36Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
They explained in a video why they do it… Most creators are explicit in why they do it. If they didn’t - their channel wouldn’t reach as far as it did otherwise.
Oh, I completely understand why they did it. And why they have the thumbnails of a person looking shocked at whatever the subject matter is. But I hate it. The change is a tangible downgrade that cheapens the channels who do it. I'm glad for them that they have a larger reach, but I'm no longer a part of that reach because I can't stomach the chintzy thumbnails and titles designed to appeal to first-graders. I voted…
Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
But you clicked.
Not the GP, but I didn't click and rather decided to check the comments for a summary. Thankfully someone usually adds that for clickbait title articles.
It's a mystery, people are tortured by mysteries. "How the Contents of this Tiny Green Box Completely Changed My Priorities!"
There were one or more homeless teen spare-changers that loitered around Pioneer Square in Portland, OR in the 90s who would tell people riddles, and charge them for the answers.
Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened
#39Shameless link here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZqirAnnqaCZ8lT8w7p2P...
I haven't posted it here yet as a "Show HN", because I don't think that I'm far enough along. But I have averaged more than one video a day since I started.
Disclaimer: This is 100% live coding in Vim. You are my rubber duck. I make mistakes. The most recent video will be going up soon, in which I track down a memory leak.
Last night I added "if..then" statements, but that video is not finished editing yet.
I don't have a massive following, and since I don't do the "fast paced, instant gratification" type of videos, I doubt that I'll ever develop a large following. But that's not the point. I wanted to put this out there simply because I thought that it should exist.
Also worth noting: This is not a copy of the "Crafting Interpreters" book by Robert Nystrom, although I think it's a great book!
Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Engagement" on YouTube typically means likes/comments on your videos. It is well understood that the YouTube algorithm treats engagement as a significant positive signal to recommend your video to non-subscribers (or even, with enough traction, on the home page).
Does YouTube give you a numeric score for engagement?
The exact way these numbers are combined in the algorithm isn't revealed (and I assume is ever changing).