Live data from Hacker News

I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened

alexhyett.com

31–40 of 156 posts

Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened

#31
I appreciate the author's enthusiasm for their subject, but titles like '8 Data Structures in 10 minutes' make me lol.

Practically speaking the engagement-centric approach this post appears to advocate for is likely to fail in the long run, if the goal is to build something lasting and not just a short-term experiment. For example, one of the more successful and lasting computing tutorial Youtubers is TheCherno, basically focusing on C++ and game engines and graphics. Clearly, a lot of effort goes into each post, and even though they're perhaps not as frequent, over time they do very well:

https://www.youtube.com/c/TheChernoProject

Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened

#32

Thanks for the great post! I'm curious - roughly how much income does this level of engagement generate on YouTube?

> When it comes to YouTube monetization you need to have 1,000 subscribers and 4,000 watch hours over a 12-month period.

> As you can see I am not there yet by a long shot!

Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened

#33
I've been contemplating creating YouTube videos like the Khan Academy ones, but for a niche area. The aim is to help students understand the subject, so I don't need a camera. But I do need some form of a touch device where I can write, draw graphs, show text, etc. and just record that. And there will be no monetization.

Anyone have any recommendations for such a setup?

Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened

#35
post #13
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The sad state of headlines and video titles. Even Veritasium, an otherwise reputable channel, has jumped this shark.

They explained in a video why they do it… Most creators are explicit in why they do it. If they didn’t - their channel wouldn’t reach as far as it did otherwise.

Oh, I completely understand why they did it. And why they have the thumbnails of a person looking shocked at whatever the subject matter is.

But I hate it. The change is a tangible downgrade that cheapens the channels who do it. I'm glad for them that they have a larger reach, but I'm no longer a part of that reach because I can't stomach the chintzy thumbnails and titles designed to appeal to first-graders. I voted with my feet on that change.

Maybe that's just me.

Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened

#36
post #2

1 Month and already incapable of writing a normal title.

But you clicked.

Not the GP, but I didn't click and rather decided to check the comments for a summary. Thankfully someone usually adds that for clickbait title articles.

Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened

#37
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They explained in a video why they do it… Most creators are explicit in why they do it. If they didn’t - their channel wouldn’t reach as far as it did otherwise.

Oh, I completely understand why they did it. And why they have the thumbnails of a person looking shocked at whatever the subject matter is. But I hate it. The change is a tangible downgrade that cheapens the channels who do it. I'm glad for them that they have a larger reach, but I'm no longer a part of that reach because I can't stomach the chintzy thumbnails and titles designed to appeal to first-graders. I voted…

I find this as childish as to not read a book because it doesn’t have a flashy cover.

Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But you clicked.

Not the GP, but I didn't click and rather decided to check the comments for a summary. Thankfully someone usually adds that for clickbait title articles.

Clicking on the headline on HN is still clicking on the headline.

It's a mystery, people are tortured by mysteries. "How the Contents of this Tiny Green Box Completely Changed My Priorities!"

There were one or more homeless teen spare-changers that loitered around Pioneer Square in Portland, OR in the 90s who would tell people riddles, and charge them for the answers.

Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened

#39
I'm recording a series where I'm creating a new programming language.

Shameless link here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZqirAnnqaCZ8lT8w7p2P...

I haven't posted it here yet as a "Show HN", because I don't think that I'm far enough along. But I have averaged more than one video a day since I started.

Disclaimer: This is 100% live coding in Vim. You are my rubber duck. I make mistakes. The most recent video will be going up soon, in which I track down a memory leak.

Last night I added "if..then" statements, but that video is not finished editing yet.

I don't have a massive following, and since I don't do the "fast paced, instant gratification" type of videos, I doubt that I'll ever develop a large following. But that's not the point. I wanted to put this out there simply because I thought that it should exist.

Also worth noting: This is not a copy of the "Crafting Interpreters" book by Robert Nystrom, although I think it's a great book!

Re: I Posted on YouTube Consistently for 1 Month. This Is What Happened

#40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Engagement" on YouTube typically means likes/comments on your videos. It is well understood that the YouTube algorithm treats engagement as a significant positive signal to recommend your video to non-subscribers (or even, with enough traction, on the home page).

Does YouTube give you a numeric score for engagement?

Not to my knowledge. Youtube's analytics generally don't give computed magic numbers like that, they give information like "number of comments per minute when the video released" or "average watch time" or "ratio of likes to views".

The exact way these numbers are combined in the algorithm isn't revealed (and I assume is ever changing).

Post reply on HN