11–20 of 23 posts
Kind of odd, it was announced as "Amber.js": http://yehudakatz.com/2011/12/08/announcing-amber-js/
I'm wondering if there was some kind of copyright/trademark issue at play here.
amber.js had a nice feel to it -- ember.js, not so much.
amber.js had a nice feel to it -- ember.js, not so much.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm wondering if there was some kind of copyright/trademark issue at play here.
Nope. We just didn't feel good about the naming conflict. See http://yehudakatz.com/2011/12/12/amber-js-formerly-sproutcor...
(Purely in my personal and unweighty (as it should be) opinion.)
So Sproutcore 2.0 split into two camps, Ember.js and Amber.js? Someone correct me if I'm wrong, this is confusing.
Instead of going with "amber.js" they went with "ember.js" sproutcore 2.0 = amber.js = ember.js They're all the same with the final one being the official new name.