Sproutcore 2.0 renamed to Ember.js - GitHub
1–10 of 23 posts
Re: Sproutcore 2.0 renamed to Ember.js - GitHub
#2So Sproutcore 2.0 split into two camps, Ember.js and Amber.js? Someone correct me if I'm wrong, this is confusing.
Re: Sproutcore 2.0 renamed to Ember.js - GitHub
#3So Sproutcore 2.0 split into two camps, Ember.js and Amber.js? Someone correct me if I'm wrong, this is confusing.
Instead of going with "amber.js" they went with "ember.js"
sproutcore 2.0 = amber.js = ember.js
They're all the same with the final one being the official new name.
Re: Sproutcore 2.0 renamed to Ember.js - GitHub
#4So Sproutcore 2.0 split into two camps, Ember.js and Amber.js? Someone correct me if I'm wrong, this is confusing.
Instead of going with "amber.js" they went with "ember.js" sproutcore 2.0 = amber.js = ember.js They're all the same with the final one being the official new name.
Ahh thanks so much.
Re: Sproutcore 2.0 renamed to Ember.js - GitHub
#5Kind of odd, it was announced as "Amber.js":
Re: Sproutcore 2.0 renamed to Ember.js - GitHub
#6Kind of odd, it was announced as "Amber.js": http://yehudakatz.com/2011/12/08/announcing-amber-js/
I'm wondering if there was some kind of copyright/trademark issue at play here.
Re: Sproutcore 2.0 renamed to Ember.js - GitHub
#7Kind of odd, it was announced as "Amber.js": http://yehudakatz.com/2011/12/08/announcing-amber-js/
Re: Sproutcore 2.0 renamed to Ember.js - GitHub
#8Re: Sproutcore 2.0 renamed to Ember.js - GitHub
#9amber.js had a nice feel to it -- ember.js, not so much.
Re: Sproutcore 2.0 renamed to Ember.js - GitHub
#10Confused this with ender for a second... (http://ender.no.de/)