Live data from Hacker News

Mastodon gained 70k users after Musk’s Twitter takeover

theguardian.com

261–270 of 276 posts

Re: Mastodon gained 70k users after Musk’s Twitter takeover

#261
post #259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Need to have people on your home node following people on the other node for your own node to be aware. Really unfriendly to small nodes / people who run their own personal nodes.

The idea is to have a view built by the connections people on your instance make. The view from tech.lgbt is different from the view from photog.social, and that's a feature. Smaller nodes can subscribe to relays if they find it too limiting.

> The idea is to have a view built by the connections people on your instance make. The view from tech.lgbt is different from the view from photog.social, and that's a feature.

I looked at: a) https://mstdn.social/tags/opensource b) https://tech.lgbt/tags/opensource c) https://photog.social/tags/opensource

They look completely identical, the feature isn't working.

I'm sceptical it's even an intended feature as much as just the overall result of the protocol design not putting too much thought into it.

> Smaller nodes can subscribe to relays if they find it too limiting.

I looked into it, that's actually a better solution than the old one I was aware of which involved a bot account automatically subscribing to different accounts across the fediverse. It's my understanding that needs to be explicitly configured by a Mastodon administrator for a subscription though, out of the hands of the user.

This still isn't particularly user friendly and I still think this is a terrible user experience, particularly when comments like these appear:

>>>> Hashtags play a huge role on Mastodon - discover people by following hashtags

>>> I'm probably twiddling the wrong buttons or something but whenever I've clicked on a Fediverse hashtag, it's always just been the hashtag on the originating server. Is there a way to get a wider view that I've missed?

Re: Mastodon gained 70k users after Musk’s Twitter takeover

#262
post #259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The idea is to have a view built by the connections people on your instance make. The view from tech.lgbt is different from the view from photog.social, and that's a feature. Smaller nodes can subscribe to relays if they find it too limiting.

> The idea is to have a view built by the connections people on your instance make. The view from tech.lgbt is different from the view from photog.social, and that's a feature. I looked at: a) https://mstdn.social/tags/opensource b) https://tech.lgbt/tags/opensource c) https://photog.social/tags/opensource They look completely identical, the feature isn't working. I'm sceptical it's even an intended feature as much a…

They were just two random examples. As a server's connections build, it'll inevitably reach a point where it sees most/all of the network and it's no longer distinguishable.

Re: Mastodon gained 70k users after Musk’s Twitter takeover

#263
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not very different. The hardest thing to grasp is the decentralization.

According to another user it's not even decentralized, but centralized into competing blocs.

How so? Every instance is not independent, they all communicate with each other. In practice, it's like everyone (Misskey, Pleroma, Mastodon) is on the same platform, except that some users have an address after their handle.

Re: Mastodon gained 70k users after Musk’s Twitter takeover

#264
post #240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mastodon looks like Twitter, functions like Twitter, apes Twitter's features such as using @username, and even calls its posts "Toots." You really can't honestly argue that Mastodon isn't trying to be Twitter.

using pieces that work well and that users enjoy doesn’t preclude you from also doing other things differently. just because hacker news has usernames, comments, and voting, that doesn’t mean it’s “trying to be reddit” there are countless little things one can change that make it an entirely different experience even if some features are similar. just like hackernews to reddit, the experience i’ve had on mastodon has…

This isn't "shares some features", this is directly copies the look and functionality of Twitter. It may have some differences, but so much is the same you can't argue that isn't what they were going for.

Re: Mastodon gained 70k users after Musk’s Twitter takeover

#265
post #257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some people hate fun and think the internet needs to be 100% professional at all times and only used by professionals.

It's not even fart. The developer didn't know that was a meaning in the US when he changed the name to that. It's the sound a Mastodon makes. This is 100% people projecting their own assumptions and judging based on that, not anything to do with the project. It's not even a meaning I considered back when he made the change, and it's one of the meanings in the version of English I speak. Folks tell on themselves when…

It’s ridiculous. Names matter. This is almost as bad as Soylent, or Coq.

Re: Mastodon gained 70k users after Musk’s Twitter takeover

#267
post #257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not even fart. The developer didn't know that was a meaning in the US when he changed the name to that. It's the sound a Mastodon makes. This is 100% people projecting their own assumptions and judging based on that, not anything to do with the project. It's not even a meaning I considered back when he made the change, and it's one of the meanings in the version of English I speak. Folks tell on themselves when…

It’s ridiculous. Names matter. This is almost as bad as Soylent, or Coq.

I find it funny that this is the only answer from someone affected, and it doesn't even attempt to explain what is wrong with the name, even as a snark.

Re: Mastodon gained 70k users after Musk’s Twitter takeover

#268
post #259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The idea is to have a view built by the connections people on your instance make. The view from tech.lgbt is different from the view from photog.social, and that's a feature. Smaller nodes can subscribe to relays if they find it too limiting.

> The idea is to have a view built by the connections people on your instance make. The view from tech.lgbt is different from the view from photog.social, and that's a feature. I looked at: a) https://mstdn.social/tags/opensource b) https://tech.lgbt/tags/opensource c) https://photog.social/tags/opensource They look completely identical, the feature isn't working. I'm sceptical it's even an intended feature as much a…

If I look at [1] whilst logged in to that instance, I do get a slightly different (first couple of pages have a few more posts, then it starts diverging) view than from [2] where I am not logged in. Also slight difference from [3] in that posts from, e.g., @infosec_jobs@mastodon.social are not there but are in [1] and [2].

[1] https://octodon.social/tags/opensource

[2] https://tech.lgbt/tags/opensource

[3] https://photog.social/tags/opensource

Re: Mastodon gained 70k users after Musk’s Twitter takeover

#269
post #257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not even fart. The developer didn't know that was a meaning in the US when he changed the name to that. It's the sound a Mastodon makes. This is 100% people projecting their own assumptions and judging based on that, not anything to do with the project. It's not even a meaning I considered back when he made the change, and it's one of the meanings in the version of English I speak. Folks tell on themselves when…

It’s ridiculous. Names matter. This is almost as bad as Soylent, or Coq.

Soylent: $133m in funding

Coq: still going strong after 33 years

I am not sure your examples make the point you think they make. Names don't seem to matter.

Re: Mastodon gained 70k users after Musk’s Twitter takeover

#270
post #263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

According to another user it's not even decentralized, but centralized into competing blocs.

How so? Every instance is not independent, they all communicate with each other. In practice, it's like everyone (Misskey, Pleroma, Mastodon) is on the same platform, except that some users have an address after their handle.

There's apparently a few very popular instances that are not federated at all with any of the other popular instances.
Post reply on HN