Live data from Hacker News

Windows 11 runs on fewer than 1 in 6 PCs

theregister.com

21–30 of 83 posts

Re: Windows 11 runs on fewer than 1 in 6 PCs

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the centered taskbar

As an ultrawide monitor user, I love the centered Taskbar. I only use Windows for gaming, but I couldn't use it for work if I didn't have the task bar centered.

You can probably do this with Windows 10 using TaskBarX[0].

[0] https://github.com/ChrisAnd1998/TaskbarX

Re: Windows 11 runs on fewer than 1 in 6 PCs

#22
It's kinda sad, I remember when every windows release was an event in itself, I would try to get a hold of early releases and marvel at all the changes (except the tiles of windows 8... that was a step too far).

But it's not even that I don't like windows 11... I genuinely don't care. Windows 10 works, a _lot_ of my apps are in the browser or in a browser-ish environment anyway (electron). There are no new exciting features in the desktop space? Thinking about it, I have a mac at work and I don't care about the OS updates either way. It's all incremental now.

For a while the mobile OS were exciting but it's getting boring as well.

Re: Windows 11 runs on fewer than 1 in 6 PCs

#23

Windows 11 is kind of like Metaverse. Nobody wants this except Microsoft deluded executives. Why couldn't they keep improving the Windows 10 and listen to what people actually want?

What's wrong with Windows 11?

The new taskbar is the most visible - it can't be on the sides, can't be resized, and breaks a large number of workflows around right clicking, dragging, and more.

Context menus are a mess, hiding most options multiple levels deep when there's plenty of space.

Every quarter they get more intrusive trying to get you to click on the wrong button that will change your browser and default apps, and they use every antipattern short of moving the window under your cursor to try to convince you not to change away from their defaults. Yes, Win10 had a "are you sure you don't want Edge" popup but Win11 is far worse.

It's also harder than ever (maybe impossible now?) to create a local user account.

Re: Windows 11 runs on fewer than 1 in 6 PCs

#24
post #11

There must be a word for people who complain relentlessly about a brand or company but keep going back to it anyway.

People with absolutely no other option.

Linux is fine if you're a developer, but if you're a gamer or artist that needs real GPUs then you're stuck on Windows.

Re: Windows 11 runs on fewer than 1 in 6 PCs

#25
post #3

I will be avoiding Windows 11 for as long as possible. From my understanding, the issue is that you can only install Windows 11 on computers with a TPM, which they then plan to use to shove DRM down your throat. No thank you. I should not have to "cam" my own computer, because my own computer wont allow me to capture whats visible on the screen. Fuck that.

Maybe, maybe not. I managed to disable TPM when installing Windows 11 on a virtual machine using a guide from Oracle of all places.

> https://blogs.oracle.com/virtualization/post/install-microso...

Don't know if this works for bare metal.

Re: Windows 11 runs on fewer than 1 in 6 PCs

#26
post #11

There must be a word for people who complain relentlessly about a brand or company but keep going back to it anyway.

"Consumers".

This is the difference between "consumer" and "customer".

A customer has control over their money. They make choices that benefit themselves and producers must compete with one another for their money.

A consumer is just somebody whose job is to not only eat the shit shoveled at them, but work their ass off and live in debt for the joy of eating it.

But, don't worry, the government will step in and give you "consumer rights" and protect you. Lol.

Re: Windows 11 runs on fewer than 1 in 6 PCs

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's wrong with Windows 11?

The main question is whats the benefit of windows 11 over windows 10? I only see disadvantage where we need to have TPM so we can accept their DRM in future, or useless taskbar where dragging and dropping doesn't work etc. Not to mention that additional bloats that will be added in windows 10. Windows Xp could run in 128MB and that was perfectly fine for people like me. But now even 4gigs is not sufficient to run pc…

I think it has WSL GUI, so you can run Linux graphical applications.

https://youtu.be/kC3eWRPzeWw

Re: Windows 11 runs on fewer than 1 in 6 PCs

#28
I've been building computers for decades and still had to search online for the obscurely-named BIOS setting that enables TPM so that I could upgrade to Win11.

So I'm sure that's a stumbling block for a lot of people whose machines are technically capable of upgrading.

Re: Windows 11 runs on fewer than 1 in 6 PCs

#29
post #11

There must be a word for people who complain relentlessly about a brand or company but keep going back to it anyway.

People with absolutely no other option. Linux is fine if you're a developer, but if you're a gamer or artist that needs real GPUs then you're stuck on Windows.

Gaming is changing very rapidly now that Valve is investing real resources into the platform to support the steam deck.

Re: Windows 11 runs on fewer than 1 in 6 PCs

#30

Windows 11 is kind of like Metaverse. Nobody wants this except Microsoft deluded executives. Why couldn't they keep improving the Windows 10 and listen to what people actually want?

The point of Windows 11 isn't to provide new features to the end user, it's to establish "security" (read: DRM) APIs as a core part of the OS and ensure they are guaranteed to be available as a baseline feature on every Windows 11 machine, something Microsoft could not do simply by releasing a Windows 10 update due to the TPM hardware requirement. The end goal is to enable developers, including Microsoft themselves, to ship software that can refuse to run if you installed a driver not blessed by Microsoft or have otherwise tampered with the OS.

And yes, many companies definitely want this. Some anti-cheat solutions have already jumped on the remote attestation bandwagon and make use of the TPM when running on Windows 11, with Windows 10 being temporarily exempt from the requirement (not unlike what happened with SafetyNet and the "basic" attestation fallback/loophole). It's only a matter of time until Windows 10 is left behind and everything starts requiring remote attestation. After all the McDonald's Android app requires SafetyNet, so why shouldn't also make sure you are not having too much fun with it?

Post reply on HN