Live data from Hacker News

Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

spacex.com

281–290 of 305 posts

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#281
post #47

Possibly the most expensive thing in the world with a publicly listed price ($97M) and sales contact (sales@spacex.com)? https://www.spacex.com/media/Capabilities&Services.pdf Just find that amusingly 'accessible'.

No sales contact, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_buildin... does enumerate nominal costs 3 orders of magnitude higher.

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#282

I'm kind of surprised a random SpaceX launch is #1 on HN, when on the same day, China just completed their modular space station: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33422779

Space Stations have been done before. Most of what SpaceX is doing has not.

Well the video does say that this is the 150th and 151st landing of a re-usable rocket. :-)

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#283

The view from below of the boosters after entry burn where you can clearly see they're not just falling straight down but actually achieving some horizontal velocity across the ground was really cool. I've always known that they had some cross-range capability, but this was a really excellent visualization of it!

Scott Manley did a good break down of their landing profile. They maintain a ballistic trajectory set to miss the landing pad / barge and it's only on successful re-ignition of the engine that they align with the landing pad.

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#284
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good. Call China what it is.

A country with a impressive history of not declaring war on another state and who has drawn the ire of USA simply because they see it as credible economic competition?

They've effectively declared war on Taiwan by now. Maybe not diplomatically but their president for life has been saying they'll take it through force, which amounts to the same thing.

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#285
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$1,000,000 per lb for R&D is steep, but at this stage in the game makes sense. I wonder what the unit price for a break-even 1lb saving would be. Is it worth spending $20,000 to shave off a pound with expensive materials?

That doesn't make sense. So if I buy a top spec model and make it 400lbs lighter I can double the price?

If you could take a top spec model, cut the weight by 400lbs without effecting the crafts capability, you could certainly sell it at a premium yeah, it would be some difference between the current price and the fuel cost savings shedding 400lbs casuses over the lifetime of the aircraft. Cerium estimated $2,600 per lb over the lifetime of the craft so yeah, that's a ~$1,040,000 in value there.

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> defined to begin at 100 km altitude I guess this is probably on Earth, which makes me wonder how far up from Earth's moon do you have to go to be "in space"?

It's also defined for Mars (80 km) and Venus (250 km), with the same definition of where winged flight is possible based on atmospheric density and local gravity. For an airless body, there's no real meaning to the definition, the surface is pretty much equivalent to space.

Winged flight is not possible in LEO but yet Starlink satellites are definitely affected by the earth's atmo

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's indeed kinda refreshing to see a company actually put such a high pricetag out there... and all the more frustrating that so many companies demand contact info for a "quote" when I don't need to do that to launch something into outer fucking space .

Honestly, I think this would absolutely justify the Contact For Quote. What's your payload? What size is it? Will it be a dedicated flight, or can we ride share with other customers? So many questions just to do something silly like "launch something into outer fucking space". Also, nitpick, but is geosync orbit actually outer space?

> Honestly, I think this would absolutely justify the Contact For Quote.

Absolutely, which is exactly why it's so ridiculous that so many sales teams demand implied consent to receive their spam solely to get some kind of number for something far, far less.

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#288
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's plenty of listed real estate that goes into the tens to hundreds of millions (and billions) with a contact and pricing. here's one right now: https://www.commercialcafe.com/commercial-property/us/ny/new... Listed price, and even a phone number to call. Go ahead, make an offer ;)

Only a sucker would buy this property. It'll be underwater within a decade or two...

Yea sure it will....

https://www.climatedepot.com/2022/11/01/new-york-times-clima...

You climate change terrorists crack me up.

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#289
post #47

Possibly the most expensive thing in the world with a publicly listed price ($97M) and sales contact (sales@spacex.com)? https://www.spacex.com/media/Capabilities&Services.pdf Just find that amusingly 'accessible'.

Maybe some of ASML's EUV lithography machines would be contenders?

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#290
post #22
post #9

Did the center booster land? What timecode was that at?

i believe the orbit and mass requirement meant there was no fuel left for landing the center stage. I think the configuration where they can't re-use the booster is called "full thrust".

"Full Thrust" is the name for Falcon 9 v1.2 when they upgraded to Merlin D engines which are a lot more powerful than Merlin C. All current Falcon 9's are Full Thrust, expandable or reusable.
Post reply on HN