Live data from Hacker News

Twitter staff have been told to work 84-hour weeks

businessinsider.com

1–10 of 91 posts

Re: Twitter staff have been told to work 84-hour weeks

#3
"Twitter managers have told some staff to work 12-hour shifts, seven days a week "

"Staff worry that their careers at Twitter could be over if they don't complete their tasks by the early November deadlines, CNBC reported."

I would be more worried my career wouldn't be over.

Re: Twitter staff have been told to work 84-hour weeks

#6
"I work at Google and they've told me to work 125 hours weeks". In that statement I provided just as much evidence for my claim as the article does their claim. In fact, there's more proof for my claim since it has a username tied to it, whereas the article just cites anonymous "according to internal sources".

And yet, this is an article that how many thousands of people will read, and internalize into their model of reality? How much more hate will such an article foster?

Shouldn't we at least require some SHRED of proof for articles such as these?

Re: Twitter staff have been told to work 84-hour weeks

#9
post #7

Does America not have the concept of constructive dismissal?

In California, you don't need to construct a dismissal. It's an "at-will" employment state, which means you can be fired at any time without any reason or any reason (so long as if there's a reason, it's not because of a minor list of things.)

In practice what this means is, in tech at least, you're thrown a nickle or two in exchange for an agreement, among other things, that you won't sure the company for violating your rights later.

Post reply on HN