Live data from Hacker News

Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

spacex.com

51–60 of 305 posts

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#51

Seeing those boosters land will never get old. I drive by one on my way to work every day and it's just amazing how large they are.

And for some reason seeing 2 land at the same time is a 100 times cooler. Seems like coolness is non-linear.

I think, to some degree, this is because we got used to seeing one landing.

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hopefully once Starship launches, we'll never see a disposable core again.

They are different classes of launch vehicles. This payload is not really a good one for starship, and conversely, starlinks will never fly on heavy

I'm pretty sure the goal with Starship is that the economics are so much better that it's used even for awkward launches. I do not believe they are targeting Falcon Heavy launches in the long-term, assuming the best-case Starship scenarios.

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#53

When does/do the research/space programs enabled by these more frequent launches start to benefit us all? It must have already contributed to something somehow. Agriculture? Defense? Oil exploration? Seems like the sort of information that's hard to find.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spinoff_technologies

This doesn't perfectly answer your question.

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't need to imagine - just look up the SLS program and it's budget + timeframe

And the fact it will cost about 10x as much compared to SpaceX rockets to deliver something to orbit. SLS is a total failure.

It's amazing how many people hold this opinion (OP) when it could be resolved with < 1 minute of research.

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hopefully once Starship launches, we'll never see a disposable core again.

They are different classes of launch vehicles. This payload is not really a good one for starship, and conversely, starlinks will never fly on heavy

Yes, it's really odd to see a GEO launch rather than a GTO at launch. GTO is a geosynchronous transfer orbit with apogee at GEO and perigee at LEO that uses the satellite's thrusters to circularize to full GEO. Starship can't do a GEO directly, it would need refueling or a kick stage to do GEO.

Since we really don't know why the Space Force wanted direct GEO we can't know for sure if refueling or a kick stage would have met requirements or not. Would it be good enough as long as the satellite to stay hidden inside the fairing during refueling?

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#56
post #47

Possibly the most expensive thing in the world with a publicly listed price ($97M) and sales contact (sales@spacex.com)? https://www.spacex.com/media/Capabilities&Services.pdf Just find that amusingly 'accessible'.

It's indeed kinda refreshing to see a company actually put such a high pricetag out there... and all the more frustrating that so many companies demand contact info for a "quote" when I don't need to do that to launch something into outer fucking space.

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#57
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm guessing you're referring to the stiffener that helps the second stage engine's nozzle hold its shape?

no not the stiffener but in the shot were you can see the stiffener at stage separation you can see the cables flying around too.

WAG: data connectors.

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#58

When does/do the research/space programs enabled by these more frequent launches start to benefit us all? It must have already contributed to something somehow. Agriculture? Defense? Oil exploration? Seems like the sort of information that's hard to find.

Ukraine has access to world class command and control with it and is leveraging to obliterate the Russian military.

People living in areas that telco and cable refuse to serve are finally able to join civilization.

Re: Falcon Heavy Launch [video]

#59

When does/do the research/space programs enabled by these more frequent launches start to benefit us all? It must have already contributed to something somehow. Agriculture? Defense? Oil exploration? Seems like the sort of information that's hard to find.

Millions of people are benefiting from Starlink, which is SpaceX's biggest launch customer.
Post reply on HN