It's like reading classic literature - the stuff that stays around is more likely to be of relevance. Filtering out the news from daily newspapers means I miss out on opinion, poorly researched facts and stories that turn out to be garbage before the weekend. Sure I occasionally read about a major story as it happens, or if something is important to me.
Ask HN: Have you stopped reading most news?
141–150 of 262 posts
Re: Ask HN: Have you stopped reading most news?
#142I live in Ukraine. From 2015 till 2022 I didn’t read or watched news and no social media or blogs or analytics. Then war started. Now I follow news everyday, because I have to take care of my family’s security. I follow analytics of battlefields progress so if I see warning signs I would have to take decisions to move my family further to the western part. I follow news on volunteers who help military so I can take a…
What sources of news are reliable on the conflict? I can't find anything which doesn't reek of propaganda: Western or Russian.
On YouTube I follow Denys Davydov, a Ukrainian pilot that reports about the war. A few days ago he showed a video of a Ukrainian helicopter flying close over traffic, and he was critiquing how irresponsibly and dangerous that was. He claims to know that road and that is was far from the battlefield. So even him as a Ukrainian is able to try and be as objective as possible.
News can be objective. The claim that western media is full of propaganda is just kremlin propaganda.
Re: Ask HN: Have you stopped reading most news?
#143I pay for Bloomberg, WSJ, and NY Times. Its an okay mix, with its leaning, but a phenomenal mix with the depth of reporting. I've stopped bothering with free news. archive.is doesn't quite cut it
Re: Ask HN: Have you stopped reading most news?
#144That's "News" to me. I read HN on and off during the day, when I'm waiting for a test to complete or there's some other reason for a break, and there's also some technical stuff I follow.
So no, I have not stopped reading news. Can't do that, I'd rather know what happens before I get it in the face. But I mostly get my news at breakfast, then I (mostly) concentrate on other stuff the rest of the day, and I may check news again after dinner.
I never touch FB or Twitter. I did have an account on FB once, just because someone said "You should make an account so that others don't make one in your name" so, well, I did.. and FB blocked me after a while, presumably because I never posted anything. Anyway, FB? That's not what comes to mind if someone says "News".
Re: Ask HN: Have you stopped reading most news?
#145> "These are, somehow, curated news extracting relevant trends and some edge cases for borderline nerds, that don’t want to miss out, nor spend a shit-ton of time filtering trivia."
Re: Ask HN: Have you stopped reading most news?
#146For news, I don't seek them out much, HN is my daily source of new interesting stuff.. (I find it similar in some way to fazed org back when.. though more technically focused).
I have subscribe to a few RSS feeds, worldnews and a few others on reddit that I peruse once in a while, but not even weekly.. Along with hackaday feeds.
I do visit gossip sites daily, to glance over the headlines, but I rarely click on them, it's more of a meta-thing, getting some idea of what society is interested in, rather than trying to find out what's actually happening (which I don't think you can from those sources anyway)
Re: Ask HN: Have you stopped reading most news?
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
What sources of news are reliable on the conflict? I can't find anything which doesn't reek of propaganda: Western or Russian.
You're probably being downvoted because of the mere suggestion that Western propaganda is shaping the narrative but this is something that also irks me. I do not defend at all any of Russia's actions but the fact that it's just become commonly accepted that the war happened because "PuTiN iS cRaZyyy" is kinda scary. Absolutely no mention of the US' role in this or the fact that NATO specifically sent Boris to stop th…
It has little to do with the quality of the news, more with the psychosocial mechanisms of any polarized conflict that involves life and death. One may lament it, but only from the outside and at some distance.
As a side note one might wonder if this is not a main purpose of war: to create a polarized environment where dissent becomes impossible.
Re: Ask HN: Have you stopped reading most news?
#148Re: Ask HN: Have you stopped reading most news?
#149They explicitly separate "views" from factual reporting, so, in general, you can expect factual reports, and you can draw your own conclusions.
Re: Ask HN: Have you stopped reading most news?
#150Respect of the past instead of just reading headlines, now turned too much into pure propaganda, I try to spot trend aggregating different PR news here and there. It's time consuming but as a sysadmin I have many "free time" still bound to a desktop so... when I'm on holidays, on a trip etc I just casually looks headlines and coming back skim a bit what's accumulated, generally dropping the excess. Not really a good balance but effective enough for my taste.
Unfortunately in the modern world a GOOD source who made daily press review does not exists anymore so...