Earlier quoted context omitted.
Boris and Jacob strike me as politicians that understand how to play the UK system masterfully. Doubt either of them are the solution for the country but neither is anyone in labour. The corruption precedes them by centuries, and anyone who tries to fix things - like remove the special status of the City of London now will get a shorten career. Kinda like in the US to even have a chance to be the presidential candida…
> like remove the special status of the City of London For sure, because it would sink the country, these days the UK is more dependent on the city than the city is on the UK
Gross domestic product is a misleading measure of national success (2014)
221–230 of 369 posts
Re: Gross domestic product is a misleading measure of national success (2014)
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
What makes you think that RFK was substantially different from LBJ or any of the other Democrats at the time?
What makes you think he wasn’t beyond ‘sins of the father’?
Re: Gross domestic product is a misleading measure of national success (2014)
#223"The philosopher John Stuart Mill noted more than 200 years ago that, once decent living standards were assured, human efforts should be directed to the pursuit of social and moral progress and the increase of leisure, not the competitive struggle for material wealth" Yes, we took the wrong turn. Most people are subjected to a life long rat race of economic relevance/volatility where most of their waking hours are sp…
Wrong turn? Rat race? Compared to what? Your ancestors 200 years ago were malnourished, working the fields all day to eke out a miserable existence, never enjoying a single luxury in life. They didn't know how to read or write, and in any case wouldn't have had time for such luxurious activities. Human progress has brought us to the point where we have the free time to complain about how disadvantaged we are and how…
Re: Gross domestic product is a misleading measure of national success (2014)
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
> GDP is a concrete measure that is difficult to fake The best counter to that I've ever heard: "Let's say I pay you $10M to eat a pile of shit, then for kicks you pay me $10M to eat a similar pile of shit. You know what the end result is? The GDP has increased $20M, and we both have huge shit-eating grins". The GDP is laughably easy to fake.
> "Let's say I pay you $10M to eat a pile of shit, then for kicks you pay me $10M to eat a similar pile of shit. You know what the end result is? The GDP has increased $20M, and we both have huge shit-eating grins". If people were buying piles of shit for $10M, then that is what the GDP would be. That's not faking GDP.
It’s not literal, it’s just an illustration of how easily the gdp can be faked.
Re: Gross domestic product is a misleading measure of national success (2014)
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
Curious to know your definition of freedom, and what system of government it is compatible with.
If there are no systems of government compatible with freedom, does that indicate there is a problem with the idea of freedom or a problem with the idea of government?
Re: Gross domestic product is a misleading measure of national success (2014)
#226Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a BS political speech and it is very politically motivated. When you can't fix the economy (get GDP up), just claim the GDP doesn't matter. My country's president just claimed we should focus on National Happiness Product. Of course, when all your economical policies fail, economy is just numbers. And no, having an accident doesn't increase GDP. If the passengers dies, that will remove their GDP from society.…
The quote doesn't say it's not a bad measure of economy, nor that it doesn't matter.
Re: Gross domestic product is a misleading measure of national success (2014)
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A self-sufficient community would not have a GDP of 0 because they would still have transactions among themselves. Perfect self-sufficiency would actually generate a very high GDP number because of how diverse and specialized the community would have to be to take care of itself. And all this is assuming that the community uses money. A self sufficient community would have 0 GDP iff no money was exchanged.
That doesn't matter. Value was still exchanged, and can be measured.
I do think you can substitute "sum of numerical value" for GDP in most non-technical contexts and have them make sense.
In this case it could be that an economy doesn't trade 'rationally', so summing numerical values doesn't make sense. E.g. I'll trade you 1 chicken -> 2 shoes, someone else will trade 1 shoe -> 2 chickens.
I guess there would still be some numerical measure, but it'd be more of a matrix than a single number.
Re: Gross domestic product is a misleading measure of national success (2014)
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
> "Let's say I pay you $10M to eat a pile of shit, then for kicks you pay me $10M to eat a similar pile of shit. You know what the end result is? The GDP has increased $20M, and we both have huge shit-eating grins". If people were buying piles of shit for $10M, then that is what the GDP would be. That's not faking GDP.
No, the shit is free. People are just paying each other to eat it. It’s not literal, it’s just an illustration of how easily the gdp can be faked.
Still the same answer. Services are counted as production.
> It’s not literal, it’s just an illustration of how easily the gdp can be faked.
Of course it's not literal, but that's just not faking GDP. What do you actually think GDP is a measurement of?
Re: Gross domestic product is a misleading measure of national success (2014)
#229Robert Kennedy, on the campaign trail in 1968: "Too much and for too long, we seemed to have surrendered personal excellence and community values in the mere accumulation of material things. Our Gross National Product, now, is over $800 billion dollars a year, but that Gross National Product - if we judge the United States of America by that - that Gross National Product counts air pollution and cigarette advertising…
And shortly thereafter, he was assassinated. Another historical "fun fact", is that MLK wasn't assassinated while pushing for civil rights. He was killed once he shifted his focus to financial injustice and wealth inequality. Two might not be a pattern, but it's no accident these historical figures were both challenging the deep pockets status quo and they both died prematurely.
Re: Gross domestic product is a misleading measure of national success (2014)
#230Earlier quoted context omitted.
You’re quibbling over the layers of indirection a representative democracy adds, but it doesn’t fundamentally change. If the majority of people wanted to strips rights for those with disabilities, they would be well within the constitution to do it. > Democracy is ultimately the same thing as any other governing philosophy, except it’s more malleable by people without concentrated power than most other systems. Certa…
I’m not quibbling anything.